inventing ways to lose in 2010 11 nfl

I checked the site for Ryan Boxer's information. Looks impressive. Anyone have a detailed breakdown on his fight selections? I can give you 18 out of 20 winners a week at boxing the problem is that the books understand that and the lines have moves dramatically in the wrong direction. Many books, at least the ones I use, have started only posting the lines the day of or late the night before for many of possible profit fights. From what has been said, he uses a weighted system. (many do). The problem is that if he's only 20 units up and give out a -500 (almost never available anymore) or -1000 he could destroy his profit in as little as 2 fights. I'd like to analyze his selections. Any help would be appreciated.
have to give propsto sharp on his 3rd official over of the season, game went over in nyj/chi with 2:44 left in 2nd qtr. Wow. Reverse line move had me a little nervous, but great pick. tgunn
[QUOTE=tgunn;35981]have to give propsto sharp on his 3rd official over of the season, game went over in nyj/chi with 2:44 left in 2nd qtr. Wow. Reverse line move had me a little nervous, but great pick. tgunn[/QUOTE] This guy is sick. I have it as his 5th - he wrote that other program mid season after the hit rules changed and won both big overs from that progarm too. So from his actual overs "plays" he is now 5-0 this year. He was undefeated last year. I saw on the a board back a few yrs ago - he posted all of them that year and went 20-1 or something like that. insane - I wish I was following him that year too, but I've been w/ him the last few and these overs are incredible. I cashed big and now can enjoy the rest of the day! Love a play that's over before the first half. I was scared of the weather and winds and snow. Lowest total on the board, worst weather on the board, most points scored and over before the half.
You are somewhat correct, it is the 5th. But he kept a different record for the post hit, so basically 3-0 official old program and add the 2-0 on the post-hit so total would be 5-0. Awseom play. Now if the other 2 x 75%'ers can cash would be nice. tgunn

Icedtea, did you follow his experimental CFB totals? I did not, do you know how they did? tgunn
[QUOTE=tgunn;35992]Icedtea, did you follow his experimental CFB totals? I did not, do you know how they did? tgunn[/QUOTE] They didn't do that great. I think right around 50% or slightly over 50%. He told me he was spending the offseason working on it more to figure out what went wrong. I'm going to start taking "alt lines" on his overs to make a bigger profit. I'll take the reglar line and the alt line. I don't know what the alt line would have been on this game but it sailed over even the highest of alt lines.
lol... I play the halfs at 1/4 unit and double down on 2nd halfs if the first doesn't hit. I do the same for RAS totals. Works well most of the time. Try and find a local with action points if you want to get wild. tgunn
Sharp went 2-0 again on his "75" overs and those ended the year 19-8. Got his yr end recap today via email. He hit 57% on roughly 200 plays and his totals, specificall all the overs, hit 44-20 for 69%. You are right tgunn - Sharp NFL totals and RAS are all the educated bettor needs. Everyone knows RAS but Sharp is right there (if not better) IMO. 60% for 2 straight years in all NFL totals. Overs even better - 58-12 since he started! Doesn't inlude the 75&65 plays as he calls them that hit 19-8 and 20-12 this year. I didn't see all his totals back in 2006 but I did witness the 2007 forum run 69%. From when I first saw him he in 2007 to being a customer the last 2 yrs, he stands at roughly 180-100 for 64% or so, give or take a few games. That's NFL totals only, not ATS sides, which didn't do as good this year. I'd say between that and RAS, you'll stuff a few stockings!!!!! RAS at 58%, 56%, 57% last 3 yrs in BBall, 59%, 67% and 55% in CFB. What I do like about Sharp is since the overs hit consistently in the 70-80% range you can go harder on them. And I love RAS consistency as well, and he is high volume. Truu - I sent you a PM. I'll try to assemble a record of all the juice on ryan boxer's plays. Perhaps you can comment if you think it's good or not. I was amazed by some of his calls. He had the favorite (-150) in the UFC on saturday which ended in a draw, and lost roughly 3 U on the smaller action plays (-170, +125, -125, +140) but both dogs lost. I think he's up 20 U on the year. I'll try to post later this week.
[QUOTE=IceTea;36733]Sharp went 2-0 again on his "75" overs and those ended the year 19-8. Got his yr end recap today via email. He hit 57% on roughly 200 plays and his totals, specificall all the overs, hit 44-20 for 69%. You are right tgunn - Sharp NFL totals and RAS are all the educated bettor needs. Everyone knows RAS but Sharp is right there (if not better) IMO. 60% for 2 straight years in all NFL totals. Overs even better - 58-12 since he started! Doesn't inlude the 75&65 plays as he calls them that hit 19-8 and 20-12 this year. I didn't see all his totals back in 2006 but I did witness the 2007 forum run 69%. From when I first saw him he in 2007 to being a customer the last 2 yrs, he stands at roughly 180-100 for 64% or so, give or take a few games. That's NFL totals only, not ATS sides, which didn't do as good this year. I'd say between that and RAS, you'll stuff a few stockings!!!!! RAS at 58%, 56%, 57% last 3 yrs in BBall, 59%, 67% and 55% in CFB. What I do like about Sharp is since the overs hit consistently in the 70-80% range you can go harder on them. And I love RAS consistency as well, and he is high volume. Truu - I sent you a PM. I'll try to assemble a record of all the juice on ryan boxer's plays. Perhaps you can comment if you think it's good or not. I was amazed by some of his calls. He had the favorite (-150) in the UFC on saturday which ended in a draw, and lost roughly 3 U on the smaller action plays (-170, +125, -125, +140) but both dogs lost. I think he's up 20 U on the year. I'll try to post later this week.[/QUOTE] I've use Sharp for the last two years also. His Totals, especially his Overs, are unbelievable!
[QUOTE=truushot;35831]I checked the site for Ryan Boxer's information. Looks impressive. Anyone have a detailed breakdown on his fight selections? I can give you 18 out of 20 winners a week at boxing the problem is that the books understand that and the lines have moves dramatically in the wrong direction. Many books, at least the ones I use, have started only posting the lines the day of or late the night before for many of possible profit fights. From what has been said, he uses a weighted system. (many do). The problem is that if he's only 20 units up and give out a -500 (almost never available anymore) or -1000 he could destroy his profit in as little as 2 fights. I'd like to analyze his selections. Any help would be appreciated.[/QUOTE] Ryan Boxer of Sharp Football Analysis went 3-0 in the investment bets last night. These guys are awesome. He is now 27-4 which is 87%. He had: Cerrone -275 Torres -350 Silva -260 Since I haven't reviewed all my notes, I can just give you the last few fights. He's gone 6-0. Here are the investment bets for the prior 2 weeks: Bradley -195 Diaz -380 Homnick -240 Before that he had one on Maynard -150 that was a draw. And then before that was the infamous moneymaker play, where it was a boxing match in Europe somewhere, and I think the guy's name was Holyfield and he was +180 and he was an underdog investment bet. Ryan said there he didn't "trust the judges" as Holyfield was American and the other guy was from the host country. It was a title fight. So he said to take "draw" for +2600. He said to put 250 on it. The fight was dominated by our guy, and 1 judge gave it to our guy and the other 2 called it a draw, so the favorite could retain his belts. So we won draw, netted 6,500 off of a 250 investment. It was sick. Anyhow, Ryan is sick and so is Sharp - I use a bunch of services, such as RAS and Wunderdog and a few others who I buy a play from time to time, but I've not been more impressed by a service the last couple of years than I have with these guys. Each is at the top of their game. Sharp is the man for NFL, especially totals - I have not seen anyone better the last 5 years than him. Ryan is sick in boxing and MMA, clearly has inside information. Let me look back and try to compile all the juice from Boxer's fights, but since he started in October he's won just under 30 units and is 27-4 in the investment bets.