My most Profitable and Highest Recommended NFL Services

My most Profitable and Highest Recommended NFL Services A short list of my most profitable and highest recommended NFL services. I don’t care that I’m hyping them up, they deserve the praise and I’m mainly starting this thread to show people like Fez that there are guys out there beating 54% for multiple seasons… Sharp Football Analysis •He wins and has the strongest computer model I’ve ever seen in any sport – particularly for totals and specifically for overs – 83% over 5 years. I’ve personally seen them for 2007, part of 2008, 2009 and 2010. He hasn’t even lost a play on these the last 2 years. Any over from him and it’s a max bet for me without hesitation. •Totals system combined for 5 years: 226-123 (65%) •Great write-ups on “personal plays” (non-computer based) - he shares lots of reasoning and many winning angles/trends. These hit just over 58% last year. •Honest w/ honest records and reliable service & great customer service. •Releases plays EARLY, I'm talking Tues-Thursday for most of his computer totals, so you can get good lines and beat closing #s. Most of his stuff is released well before Sunday. •Last season he guaranteed not just to win, but to beat 58% on personal plays. I took him up on it and it was close at the end (very close) but he did just beat it. •Since I’ve been with him, no losing years (below 52.4%) Wunderdog •He wins – last season he hit 60%. The 4 years I’ve been with him he has hit 281-188 (60%). •His write-ups are good and full of excellent content, insight and occasional trends. •Professional and thorough – stands behind picks with his guarantee that they won’t lose or a free package, although I’ve never needed it since I buy the full season and he’s always won (except 2007 was a little sketchy). •Great customer service •If he and Sharp agree on a play, I take my normal wager and quadruple it, and have made solid, solid money this way. •Since I’ve been with him, only 1 year was below 52.4% (2007) Mike Trap •He wins – last season he hit 66%. Averaging 59% over 5 years. •Old school kind of service – just the play •Limits his plays to usually 2-3 per week, max. Which is why over 5 years he’s 92-63, so he’s not a volume player. •Honest recordkeeping and runs a good shop. •Since I’ve been with him, only 1 year was below 52.4% (2009) •More expensive vs. the other guys listed above but still worth it to me. These are my top 3. I’m not looking to make this an infomercial for them, but I want to share them to show Fez that he’s wrong and also to tell you exactly who has done it. I buy a couple other services too but these are the top/most recommended, and these are the guys who can consistently get the job done. I know cause I’ve bought them for multiple years straight and tallied my own records of w-l as well as money I win from them. I pay closer attention to NFL services because I play a ton of fantasy football and watch a ton of NFL, that I naturally bet more on it than any other sport. I hope the list helps or at least gets a convo going. Feel free to add if you guys use anyone worth checking out. I'm more than happy with my top guys but am sort of like a crack addict when it comes to services. But I won't buy from a service going forward unless they have a record on their website w/ a client who can vouch for their record being accurate. In particular, I like looking for those "less mainstream" cappers that do a damn good job but may just have poor marketing or connections. These guys will usually give a number that I can get and won't jump at release, and most of the time give plays early. This is why I like the 3 mentioned above. So if u know of others, share please!

I would like to hear about MLB in particular.... any strong recommendations there from personal experience?

Please post ANY of these guys plays 3 minutes after post every football season Prediction: UNDER 52.4%.

I'm not saying SFA is not a winner and you would know better than I would because you subscribe to his service. But, what I know, since being touted before the 2009 season at being a guy who hits over 65% (not realistic) is his record at The Sports Monitor is less than spectacular. His 2009 record was 70-64. going 46-45 on sides and 24-19 on totals. His 2010 record was 65-71 going 26-35 on sides and 39-36 on totals. He was monitored in 2010 with another group of plays called his personal plays (not a big fan of guys who have multiple services) that went 53-43, going 51-40 on sides and 2-3 on totals. What am I missing? These numbers aren't even close to your numbers. And, I understand the difference because of possible line moves but that can't be making up the large variance in these numbers. Again, not saying he is not a winner but there is a large difference between what you are saying and what an independent monitoring service is saying. Simply looking for an explanation.

I will say it I don't know him, but He's not a winner.........

[QUOTE=IceTea;41295]that there are guys out there beating 54% for multiple seasons…![/QUOTE] Stopped reading this horseshit after this....

[QUOTE=costar;41331]Stopped reading this horseshit after this....[/QUOTE] Ice Tea is over the top but you do not think there are guys that beat 54% in more than 1 year consecutatively? You are nuts buddy.

Sure, but they're random monkeys typing Shakespeare. There's just no way to know ahead of time.

[QUOTE=Sixth Sense;41321]I'm not saying SFA is not a winner and you would know better than I would because you subscribe to his service. But, what I know, since being touted before the 2009 season at being a guy who hits over 65% (not realistic) is his record at The Sports Monitor is less than spectacular. His 2009 record was 70-64. going 46-45 on sides and 24-19 on totals. His 2010 record was 65-71 going 26-35 on sides and 39-36 on totals. He was monitored in 2010 with another group of plays called his personal plays (not a big fan of guys who have multiple services) that went 53-43, going 51-40 on sides and 2-3 on totals. What am I missing? These numbers aren't even close to your numbers. And, I understand the difference because of possible line moves but that can't be making up the large variance in these numbers. Again, not saying he is not a winner but there is a large difference between what you are saying and what an independent monitoring service is saying. Simply looking for an explanation.[/QUOTE] I have no idea where those numbers come from. First of all, you have 39-36 in totals this year? Impossible - He had over 100 plays this year in NFL totals. You show him having 75. This year his totals also combined to hit 59%, brought down because of 47% on unders. Your % shows him hitting just 52%. Totally wrong, not even close. You also show his Personal Plays having a record on totals of 2-3. I know he made a couple of his totals into personal plays, but definitely not 5. The 2009 numbers are much closer to what he released than 2010 but still not right exactly - he hit 60% in totals last year, this is a fact. But the 2010 numbers they have are way off. Sharp is much better in totals than sides. But if you compare his sides to the "beat 52.4% = average" than he's very good in sides. His personal plays are generally the sides to follow, and the 3 years I have been betting the personal plays dilligently, he went 132-96 (58%). His totals are off the chart. I am telling you, his overs plays are without loss the last 2 years. He didn't give them out in 2008 until late in the season when he started charging for palys. I bet them in 2007 when he posted them online and in 2009 and 2010. He went 21-1 in 2007, 4-0 in 2009 and 6-0 in 2010 in his strongest over plays. That's 31-1, and it's no BS. I didn't bet every single one early in 2007 but I got on about 15 of them and lost 1. This season he shared the system's leans, to make more plays for the clients, and those leans went 40-22, though not all the leans were shared early in the season. Now, let's stop the dog/pony show - Sharp is not without his own problems, but those records you share are not correct. This is not a thread to dwell on the minor issues with each service, as no service is perfect and Sharp/Wunderdog/Trapp are not without their own problems. They each have things I wish were improved, but they are minor compared to most services, especially when what matters most is w/l records and prices. What I am saying is that all 3 have easily crushed the 54% margin for a number of seasons, and all 3 are heads and tails better than what you get from 95% of the other NFL services out there. I know for a fact because I've bought them all.

[QUOTE=Fezzik;41311]Prediction: UNDER 52.4%.[/QUOTE] Fez, I’ve already told you what I think of your advice on services (outdated and not to be listened to), but I will go ahead and add: So you say you think these 3 guys will not beat 52.4% moving forward, even though they have done so for the last 5 years (sharp) or 3 of the last 4 years (wunderdog & trapp), but you believe that guys like Tim T’s baseball, ER’s NBA, Dr Bob Football and RAS are better? Let me break it down: If you had any of these 3 services that I like, you would be defending them. Since you either don’t have them or haven’t heard of them, you believe they can’t beat 52.4%. This is one of your major flaws. It’s a joke. I’ve personally bought in the past from ER NBA, Dr Bob Football and RAS. Sharp’s NFL totals program is better than RAS CBB/CFB totals program. It’s that simple. I don't care if you can't comprehend it, I have both and it's true. Note that RAS has (previously) been good, it’s just that Sharp is better. Wunderdog/Sharp/Trapp are all 3 better in NFL than Dr Bob and it’s not close. Dr Bob is literally 223-224 (49.9%) the last 5 seasons (except for 2010, which he doesn’t have records posted on his site but I think he lost in 2010): 2005-06 46-66 0.41 2006-07 51-49 0.51 2007-08 48-42 0.53 2008-09 42-30 0.58 2009-10 36-37 0.49 Overall 223-224 0.49 So why buy him when you can buy any of the 3 I mentioned who actually win? As for RAS, you already know my thoughts on them from the thread in the CBB forum: Never again would I buy from them – I have no trust in them and as the market changed, they lost badly. They can’t figure out if they want to bet their stuff or sell it, and doing both won’t work. So they aren’t even in the convo for me. I’ve bought ER NBA. I like him, he’s having an outstanding year this year. He is very good, but I would not say he’s better than the 3 I mentioned. He’s in the conversation for sure, with 2 things I really like: 1.No losing seasons since 2005 2.Win percentage of 56% over that time However, as I said about the other 3 guys, Sharp has had no losing seasons either, the other guys have had just one. And all 3 guys I mentioned have a better win percentage than ER NBA. All 3 are virtually identical, with records of between 61% and 59% over 4-5 years. So while I do use ER NBA and have made money doing so (and can’t say anything negative about him), he’s not “better” than Sharp, Wunderdog or Trapp. And so this is what is so funny about you Fez – you want to pay for these other services which are WORSE than the 3 I mentioned and make the 52.4% comment. There’s a much better chance that Dr Bob, ER or RAS don’t beat 52.4% next year than there are than any or all 3 of mine don’t beat it. Complete joke. I’d gladly go on record as saying that between Sharp, Wunderdog and Trapp, there will be more of them that beat 52.4% in NFL next year than Dr Bob’s NFL, ER’s NBA and RAS CBB.