My most Profitable and Highest Recommended NFL Services

[QUOTE=costar;41331]Stopped reading this horseshit after this....[/QUOTE] I'm sorry for your bankroll. If you think that no one can beat 54% for several years, you have either wasted your money on crap services or your own handicapping sucks. I've admitted my handicapping sucks. But at least I know how to find winning services. If you think Wunderdog has not hit 60% for 4 years you are 100% wrong. Flat out. Same for Sharp and Trapp. I've seen several forum posters who can beat 54% for a few years straight and I've seen more than enough services that CAN'T do it, but I've seen a few that can. I can't imagine why you get so defensive about it. Care to elaborate? Have you never beat 54% in multiple years w/ your own handicapping? Which services do you buy and how have you fared? Sorry u are mad but the truth is the truth.

[QUOTE=joelshitshow;41346]Sure, but they're random monkeys typing Shakespeare. There's just no way to know ahead of time.[/QUOTE] Hmm, so let's see... Service A goes: 51% in 07 (21-20, -1 win on 1.1 juice) 62% in 08 (72-44, +23.6 wins) 61% in 09 (46-29, +14.6 wins) 60% in 10 (142-95, +37.5 wins) and you don't think he can beat 54% in 11? Service B's totals go: 69% in 07 (51-23, +25.7 wins) 67% in 08 (41-20, +19 wins) 60% in 09 (25-17, +6.3 wins) 59% in 10 (66-45, +16.5 wins) and you don't think he can beat 54% in 11? Service C goes: 59% in 07 (13-9, +3.1 wins) 48% in 08 (18-19, -2.9 wins) 67% in 09 (26-13, +11.7 wins) 66% in 10 (23-12, +9.8 wins) and you don't think he can beat 54% in 11? Wunderdog is service A, Sharp Football Analysis is service B, Trap is service C.

This is what I know. You came on here saying SFA is a winner. Not saying he isn't. All I know is he pays someone (The Sports Monitor) to monitor his plays and the numbers I gave you are what they came up with. Go back and ask him why his numbers are so far off from your numbers. I'd be happy to email you the reports I receive. I'm not saying services can't hit over 54%. I know it can be done. I've gone 488-399 over the last nine seasons in the NFL, which is 55%. Eight out of nine winning seasons. All of those plays are monitored by The Sports Monitor. You can match up my records exactly with their records except for one game last year that I released to my clients two weeks before the season started. I allow TSM to use the closing line, which gave me a loss, but my clients who bet the Philly/GB total over early won. That's the only difference in the records over nine years. Again, I'm just trying to figure out where the difference is coming from. If this guy is as good as you say he is, maybe I can learn something from him. I can see the difference between TSM on his personal plays and the record you are claiming. A couple of games with line moves can be a 2-3% difference. But, not the other numbers. Go back and ask him why the difference.

[QUOTE=Sixth Sense;41358]This is what I know. You came on here saying SFA is a winner. Not saying he isn't. All I know is he pays someone (The Sports Monitor) to monitor his plays and the numbers I gave you are what they came up with. Go back and ask him why his numbers are so far off from your numbers. I'd be happy to email you the reports I receive. I'm not saying services can't hit over 54%. I know it can be done. I've gone 488-399 over the last nine seasons in the NFL, which is 55%. Eight out of nine winning seasons. All of those plays are monitored by The Sports Monitor. You can match up my records exactly with their records except for one game last year that I released to my clients two weeks before the season started. I allow TSM to use the closing line, which gave me a loss, but my clients who bet the Philly/GB total over early won. That's the only difference in the records over nine years. Again, I'm just trying to figure out where the difference is coming from. If this guy is as good as you say he is, maybe I can learn something from him. I can see the difference between TSM on his personal plays and the record you are claiming. A couple of games with line moves can be a 2-3% difference. But, not the other numbers. Go back and ask him why the difference.[/QUOTE] I can definitely email him. I know there are a few other guys who have posted about SFA. Not sure if they are still paying members here or not. TGunn was one of them. They can chime in if they see this thread as to Sharp's records, particularly in totals. They may not, though, as it's not football season and maybe they left the forum. Hopefully they are here and seei t. I have no idea why the number of plays and win percentage from sports monitor is so drastically lower than what he released. For the record, I have seen your plays (not bought them) and you do have good stuff. While I can't vouch for your record personally but could tally it up from your monitoring service, you obviously are yet (another) service who can beat 52.4% long term. Don't say it too loudly, lest costar call you "horseshit" or joeshitshow calling you a "random monkeys typing Shakespeare" or hear Fez tell you that you will lose next season because you've beat 54% for too many years in a row.

I think the best thing to do is go to him directly. He's the one supplying the plays for TSM. As to my service (full disclosure) the record has been closer to 53% and 54% the last two years and was closer to 58% and 59% the three years prior to that. So, I am down a little over the past two years but still winning years. I release plays on Friday evening (so earlier than many but not as early as some). I allow TSM to use the closing line because my lines generally move against my plays so by using the closing line I figure that is a worse case scenario for clients. Generally, they can do a little better but some years it doesn't make a difference.

ANyone looking to make me look silly, JUST POST plays 1 minute after kickoffs The 55% will disappear faster than I can say select sample.....

[QUOTE=Fezzik;41379]The 55% will disappear faster than I can say select sample.....[/QUOTE] I don't get it - you want to do this so when the plays start to win you can use them for in-game betting without buying the service? You said well before last season, no one can sustain anything better than 54%. Well I had these 3 services prior to last season, and all 3 nailed right around 60% last year. It's been done. Next season is next season, I'm simply telling you, these guys did it. Whether or not they do it next season does not mean they didn't do it for 4+ years. They did. And as I said, I do think there is a better chance they do it next year than do the 3 services you are buying.

Will take Dr Bob & RAS on an even playing field vs any two mentioned for the max.

well.........maybe not ANY two............... But I agree 100% vs. any two touts............

[QUOTE=Fezzik;41414]But I agree 100% vs. any two touts............[/QUOTE] I meant any two mentioned by the original poster.