[QUOTE=jefff;42061]he actually did and documented at the RX. he continues to post there on and off.
I do have issues with Sharp that I wont bring up here but I did at the RX.
I think what brings him down is all the different plays and crap. systems and computers and personal plays and different ways to pay for crap...guaranteed and non-guaranteed. typical tout stuff. find one subset that's doing well and hype that.
there are ways he can improve but i dont care enough to go into it. there are [B]plenty[/B] worse touts out there to be sure.[/QUOTE]
I agree w/ much of what u wrote. The one thing I will say is the subsets hes created - there always was a reason he did it, to beat a move that the oddsmakers did. It was like a game of chess - last season oddsmakers raised totals, so Sharp introduced those overs leans which did very well last season. Its not like he's Wayne Root w/ Millionaire, Billionaire, NO Limit plays and hyping whichever type.... Hes got a few different system types and grades them in those categories. Agreed - he will hype different play types, whichever is doing the best. Evenso he hit 57% in everything last year... all types combined. And u have to admit, no NFL totals capper is better than him. Ive not come across any.
I definitely agree there are ways he can improve (just like the Dog and Trapp can as well). No one is perfect, so please you guys don't think that I think these 3 are 100% perfect. Like I said I've been around the block and seen a lot and these guys are much better than the competition. I find all 3 to be better than RAS, Dr. Bob, and so on... And I also agree... personally I think many, MANY worse touts out there. As I said, IMO these 3 are the best.