My most Profitable and Highest Recommended NFL Services

[QUOTE=rexd;47288]Times vary—he posts them on his FB feed, but generally Friday and Saturday nights at 10 ET. He is a night and weekend guy. Devil's Advocate may ask if he's so great, why is he not on daily? As you will hear, he is extremely knowledgeable, but “sports radio” today is more about guy radio. He’s snarky and a bit of a curmudgeon. A lot more of a sports encyclopedia than great radio listen for the casual fan. He’s also on the Philly Comcast and does pre and postgame shows on the Eagles Network, so it’s not like he’s a part-time sports guy, just spread out over a few jobs. There are VERY few—very, very few opinions I consider to be worthy of weighing heavily. To be honest, the only one I agree with that Fezzie touts is SK. Jolly is on the very short list and it’s not like I’m trying to direct business his way. I don’t know him from Adam and he doesn’t know me. It’s merely a time investment to listen and catch his plays.[/QUOTE] how has your buddy been doing? any chance we can get some of his stuff?

You said I could improve my marketability My only issue with Sharp is he was monited by The Sports Monitor and had below average results for two years. You say he is very good but all I know is the track record with The Sports Monitor. Disagree 100% with you saying the only way to do this is post the plays on the website after they kick off. What does that do that a monitor doesn't do? So he posts plays that weren't really his plays and people would complain. Same with a monitor. The monitor has a completely different record than what the tout says and people complain. Plus, the monitor has records (again someone other than the tout themselves) from past seasons for one to see. I like the independent third party much more than the tout monitoring their own record. We agree to disagree on this. Don't put words in my mouth. I have never said anything wunderdog or anything such as nobody else can win but myself. This is entirely about one saying they hit 68% or whatever record he was spouting as if it would continue. That, in and of itself, should have a disclaimer attached to it. If you truly believe he will hit over 60% for the next 10 yrs, then we are done with the discussion. Again, by him posting the records on this website, time will tell and maybe there was a screw up at The Sports Monitor but as you said you only have my record from last year to go on, I only have The Sports Monitor to go on and that wasn't good. In a few years, if he continues this, we will be on the same page.

Any opinions on the record of 'The Vegas Nightmare' Sports Betting System of Sheldon Graham ?

[QUOTE=Sixth Sense;48014]What does that do that a monitor doesn't do?[/QUOTE] a monitor does not tell people before the game what each pick is. the monitor just shares a record sometime during the next week: "Jimbo went 10-0 in his best bets in NFL week 9". That is option 1. Option 2 is that Jimbo, on his website after each game kicks off, tells the world "I took Denver +7 and XXXXX and XXXXX". And then when the game ends, he grades the results telling you "Denver +7 = L, XXX = W", and then adds those grades into the YTD record. I'd be surprised if you thought option 1 was as good.... remotely close.... anything close to option 2. It's no comparison. One is transparent. Everyone knows ur plays, everyone knows them well before the game ends. The other is so secretive it's a joke. No one knows ur plays... no one can be sure that record even is legit. i'm not talking your situation, but monitors in general. they suck.... correct me if im' wrong but i recall last year or the year before you telling clients each week: My record at sm is XX but it really is YY because ZZ.

never heard of him, do share

[QUOTE=Sixth Sense;48014]You said I could improve my marketability My only issue with Sharp is he was monited by The Sports Monitor and had below average results for two years. You say he is very good but all I know is the track record with The Sports Monitor. Disagree 100% with you saying the only way to do this is post the plays on the website after they kick off. What does that do that a monitor doesn't do? So he posts plays that weren't really his plays and people would complain. Same with a monitor. The monitor has a completely different record than what the tout says and people complain. Plus, the monitor has records (again someone other than the tout themselves) from past seasons for one to see. I like the independent third party much more than the tout monitoring their own record. We agree to disagree on this. Don't put words in my mouth. I have never said anything wunderdog or anything such as nobody else can win but myself. This is entirely about one saying they hit 68% or whatever record he was spouting as if it would continue. That, in and of itself, should have a disclaimer attached to it. If you truly believe he will hit over 60% for the next 10 yrs, then we are done with the discussion. Again, by him posting the records on this website, time will tell and maybe there was a screw up at The Sports Monitor but as you said you only have my record from last year to go on, I only have The Sports Monitor to go on and that wasn't good. In a few years, if he continues this, we will be on the same page.[/QUOTE] He is still ahead for the year in both NFL and NCAAF, but I think down the last two weeks. I don't get an exact record because I like his opinion, clearly trust it and weigh it accordingly. In reality, like Steve Kellen in NFL, I found we have a lot of similar theories and techniques, hence like both to double-check and see if I missed anything. As far as his plays, I did say that he almost always posts them on his Facebook page [url]https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002450593610&ref=ts[/url] I try to listen to his show as to hear "why" as his reasoning is very sound. FTR, Jolly's kryptonite is he loves going with double-digit rivalry dogs. I have researched this and his beloved angle does not hold water. I immediately reject his plays when he quotes that urban legend. In my non-scientific tracking, that improves his winning percentage even more.

[QUOTE=Sixth Sense;48014]My only issue with Sharp is he was monited by The Sports Monitor and had below average results for two years. You say he is very good but all I know is the track record with The Sports Monitor. Disagree 100% with you saying the only way to do this is post the plays on the website after they kick off. What does that do that a monitor doesn't do? [/QUOTE] What? One requires trust in an entity in the same industry subject to inaccuracy/influence and the other is open and verifiable by anyone.

Not much to share. Seeking your opinion or the opinion of anyone else who may have signed onto his service. Heard a radio ad on The Jim Rome Show last week for 'The Vegas Nightmare'. Went to website, [url]www.vegasnightmare.com[/url], to investigate last night. Fee is $195 per month. Recent winners identified. Received three e-mail messages from the site this morning.

[QUOTE=IceTea;47979]As u can see I was referring to CBB in particular, so let's see how you do.[/QUOTE] Off to our best start ever in CBB. We're at 67-46, 59.29%, and +19.30 units, through first 21 days of the CBB season, and December has historically been our best month.

Ed, I'm expecting 25 units in December :) Happy holidays and continued good luck!