NFL PLayoffs, 2 selections

NFL PLayoffs, 2 selections 2 Weight. SAINTS -6.5-120 (-7-105 or less is better). I would be shocked to see this game stay close..... 1 Weight. Jets +7.5-120. (+7-105 is better) Got to the party way late on this.......but numbers too strong not to play the Jets at +7 or more.

Cannot see New Orleans at all. They haven't been playing well for 10 weeks: 2-8 ATS. They were the best team way back in weeks 1-6. Arizona is 4-1 SU, 5-0 ATS the last two years in the playoffs. Warner is one of the best playoff QBs EVER! New Orleans has never covered as a home favorite in the playoffs. Yes, it's a short week for Arizona, but I'll make them some of my coffee.

Have a question... If you like New Orleans at -7, would it be better to play them on the moneyline instead? According to SBR's spread-to-moneyline calculator, a 7pt favorite should have approximate Dog Odds of +285 and favorite odds of -371.4. This makes me think that a -270 moneyline on New Orleans would be pretty cheap, if you like this side. Is this right? [url]https://www.sbrforum.com/Betting+Tools/Spread+ML+Converter.aspx[/url]

Everywhere I went today people were playing the Cardinals.

[QUOTE=EdTeach;14962]Everywhere I went today people were playing the Cardinals.[/QUOTE] evryone you know or everyone? big difference. al my friends like zona, big. they are as square as ceramic tile :)

[QUOTE=sasquatch;14959]Have a question... If you like New Orleans at -7, would it be better to play them on the moneyline instead? According to SBR's spread-to-moneyline calculator, a 7pt favorite should have approximate Dog Odds of +285 and favorite odds of -371.4. This makes me think that a -270 moneyline on New Orleans would be pretty cheap, if you like this side. Is this right? [url]https://www.sbrforum.com/Betting+Tools/Spread+ML+Converter.aspx[/url][/QUOTE] No. Apparently LVA requires a 10 character length message so I can't simply answer a yes or no question.

... [QUOTE=EdTeach;14962]Everywhere I went today people were playing the Cardinals.[/QUOTE] But did you get your bets in!! ... :)

Zona a no character, 'we quit" kind of team under adersity IMO Warner great at home and in the right circumstances.......this one isn't it. Az has had a solid year, nothing to prove, 55 points in the GB win. Reminds me of SD's win vs. Miami........and then they went to Cincy in -10 degrees and got destroyed........ok, no weather, but good luck coping with the news Grandpa Warner. Jake isn't there to throw 5 picks this time!

"Jake isn't there to throw 5 picks this time!" LOL I did an "extensive" Jake Plummer background check. (Always liked him, personally.) The bottom line, however: loser. Also predicted (on here!) the "6-0" Broncos would regress to the mean. Bingo. (Kyle tried his best.) No playoffs! WTS, the Kurt Warner-led Cardinals is another story... I'll give him a half to implode in NOs. "Da KW fumbleruskie!..." :)

[QUOTE=Fezzik;14974]Warner great at home and in the right circumstances.......this one isn't it. Az has had a solid year, nothing to prove, 55 points in the GB win. Reminds me of SD's win vs. Miami........and then they went to Cincy in -10 degrees and got destroyed........ok, no weather, but good luck coping with the news Grandpa Warner. Jake isn't there to throw 5 picks this time![/QUOTE] Fezz are you kidding me? Cardinals with nothing to prove? In case you have forgotten they lost the Super Bowl last year. That's plenty of motivation for this team. And you know you've been down on this team all year. 9-7-1 ATS, how'd that work out for you?