NFL Week #1

[QUOTE=burger;2677]He should have more winners. He had almost something like 100 plays yesterday.[/QUOTE] It was actually only 72 and I hit on about 60% of them.
Net Winners [QUOTE=burger;2677]He should have more winners. He had almost something like 100 plays yesterday.[/QUOTE] I'm talking about "net winners" Burg. Posting a lot of games doesn't necessarily translate in a lot of winning tickets...usually it's the opposite. But so far, OS and Shooter are posting a lot of "net winners". That's what I want them to keep on doing!
[QUOTE=Shooter;2680]It was actually only 72 and I hit on about 60% of them.[/QUOTE] I know. I was on a lot of them as well. I hope you keep it up. I will state though...you have no shot to finish NFL in the black if you play as many games as you did in week one...every week for the season. burger
if you can follow all those picks and get down on the numbers he posts All the power to you

We all make a lot of bets not everything is worth posting Posting USC -5 the second the openers come out...WHY ???? The line was gone in seconds lol Old school might have took Ohio St +7, 7.5 right a kickoff...you would never know he's style IMO isn't ideal for a forum
[QUOTE=RYAN;2691]if you can follow all those picks and get down on the numbers he posts All the power to you[/QUOTE] I can and I did
Doc asked Old School what his NFL record was last year. Red30 responded "Who cares? Either enjoy the information or pass. Is 57% vs. 56% going to make a difference?" I then asked "What information?", because Old School is not posting info, he's posting his picks. The reason people are interested in his picks as opposed to a random poster is that he posted for the last two years at the former LVA Sports and posted a winning record. So "Who cares?" makes no sense to me. Doc's question was totally relevant. "...enjoy the information..." makes no sense to me, since there is no info being posted. His picks are being posted. On the other issue: If he's a winning player, then it's good he's posting his plays, even if it's a minute to game time. And it's good he's posting as many of them as possible.
Personally, I'm glad they take the time to post. I actually thought I would see quite a bit more of those kind of threads when I joined. If it bothers you, no offense, just don't read them.
[QUOTE=Jacques St. Mush;2699]Doc asked Old School what his NFL record was last year. Red30 responded "Who cares? Either enjoy the information or pass. Is 57% vs. 56% going to make a difference?" I then asked "What information?", because Old School is not posting info, he's posting his picks. The reason people are interested in his picks as opposed to a random poster is that he posted for the last two years at the former LVA Sports and posted a winning record. So "Who cares?" makes no sense to me. Doc's question was totally relevant. "...enjoy the information..." makes no sense to me, since there is no info being posted. His picks are being posted. On the other issue: If he's a winning player, then it's good he's posting his plays, even if it's a minute to game time. And it's good he's posting as many of them as possible.[/QUOTE] This isn't Old School's board, and hounding him for his record in last year's NFL was curious to me. And OS was a good guy and eventually answered him. The information he posts are the plays he's on. He's pretty good at hitting numbers and predicting line moves.
[QUOTE=red30;2702]This isn't Old School's board, and hounding him for his record in last year's NFL was curious to me. And OS was a good guy and eventually answered him. The information he posts are the plays he's on. He's pretty good at hitting numbers and predicting line moves.[/QUOTE] Not only that, he was subjected to mucho nonsense by many posters at LVA, including those regarded as the sharpest of the sharp. Many would have just said F it and stopped posting. Perhaps its his ego, perhaps he is just kind and giving, but to everyone's benefit he kept posting...and even most of the most jaded sharps came to recognize he knew what the F he was doing.