NFL WEEK 15 Thread

[QUOTE=costar;49380]Ice Tea thats a little unfair - bkeiller most time its common sense i tend to stick to the higher weight stuff that fezz comes up with and then lines shop for it normally can get better numbers if you have enough outs etc - kansas bet stood out early as he mentioned it would move and it did ...and when fezz said he really liked the 4th quart bet - i got stuck in - bearing in mind fezz is a top quarts bettor.......not much more to it than that.[/QUOTE] Thanks Costar. Although I do understand Icetea's point also. If you follow blindly as I do you were a loser. Unfortunately for me if I try to pick and choose I do worse not better, LOL.
[QUOTE=costar;49380]Ice Tea thats a little unfair - bkeiller most time its common sense i tend to stick to the higher weight stuff that fezz comes up with and then lines shop for it normally can get better numbers if you have enough outs etc - kansas bet stood out early as he mentioned it would move and it did ...and when fezz said he really liked the 4th quart bet - i got stuck in - bearing in mind fezz is a top quarts bettor.......not much more to it than that.[/QUOTE] Sticking to the "higher weight" stuff certainly has not been a good strategy; W/L: One-wgt: 52-59-5, Two-wgt: 41-48-4, Three-wgt: 17-17-0, Four-wgt: 1-6-0 Overall weighted W/L: 189-230-13, 45.11%, -70.76u
Well he 5 weight that futures bet iowa under -i bet that all over the place - massive result for me so as i said when he says something is really strong i drop the hammer on it , sometimes it hard to get the number on his 4 weight stuff etc so you let a few go also - you know its strong though as mrkt agrees with him... most of his higher weight stuff over last few weeks have been good....
[QUOTE=costar;49418]Well he 5 weight that futures bet iowa under -i bet that all over the place - massive result for me so as i said when he says something is really strong i drop the hammer on it , sometimes it hard to get the number on his 4 weight stuff etc so you let a few go also - you know its strong though as mrkt agrees with him... most of his higher weight stuff over last few weeks have been good....[/QUOTE] Thats why I asked the original question of you because I have not been winning. According to Dr. Bob and my own records his 4 weights are 1-6. The quarters this week were also net losers though you implied you win with these also. Did you not bet Mia 1Q 2 weight or GB 1st Q, GB 1H or KC 3rd Q? Seems like you are staying off most of the losers and Im trying to find out how. Thanks again. Appreciate the input.

[QUOTE=costar;49418]Well he 5 weight that futures bet iowa under -i bet that all over the place - massive result for me so as i said when he says something is really strong i drop the hammer on it , sometimes it hard to get the number on his 4 weight stuff etc so you let a few go also - you know its strong though as mrkt agrees with him... most of his higher weight stuff over last few weeks have been good....[/QUOTE] Sorry to be argumentative Costar but Fezz himself said of the Iowa RSW bet, "lets call it a 1 star". How did that get turned into a 5 star for you? All 3 of the the multi-weight NFL RSW bets were losers (Chiefs, Chargers, Browns) so so I am struggling with how the higher weighted stuff has been any better.
well i asked Fezz in one of the threads how strong it was ...i thought it might be a 4star and he said 5 actually....lump job....
[QUOTE=costar;49429]well i asked Fezz in one of the threads how strong it was ...i thought it might be a 4star and he said 5 actually....lump job....[/QUOTE] Thanks I found the thread where you asked him what weight it was and he said a 5 although it was a bit confusing as you said it was a 1 but you believed it to be a 4. I may be missing some context. I was just going off Dr. Bob. Is the 1-6 on the 4 weights accurate and if so how did you navigate those?
Everyone should read today's Question of the Day at LasVegasAdvisor.com. It sheds some light on direction.
Alf gone, maybe Fezz soon to be, direction of the subscription for pay model seems to be coming apparent......
On the contrary, I think it's stabilizing and revealing a better direction. Fezzik is going back to things he's better at. There may be fewer picks, but based on methods he's been successful with. We'll see what that looks like then look for ways to complement it.