Ole Miss. down to +4.5???

Ole Miss. down to +4.5??? Before I go to my squares anonymous meeting, please advise on why line dropped from +6.5 to +4.5? My only theory is that the performances by Ole Miss against South Carolina and Vanderbilt were smokescreens to trick Bama, which has arguably the nation's best defense. Ole Miss used a similar trick last year and it worked against Florida and Bama. Am I on the right track? Or is the line off based on last year's dismal performance by Bama, and I was right all along taking Bama at -6?

some strong/popular cappers on Miss

Phil Steele underdog play. Also, the CFB #s this game has crossed, the 5 and 6, are not real strong. Nonetheless, I've been backed off. I was hoping to see +7, and obv haven't and won't.

Unless the popular cappers are running the ball or defending passes, that alone isn't a reason to believe Ole Miss will suddenly be transformed into a team that stays close with Bama. Barring inside information that a game is fixed to favor a side, the sharp capper must have information that isn't so obvious to the public, regarding mismatches of talent, strategy, etc... For example, Fezzik strongly believes that Miami Ohio has been improving every week, will play hard for 4 quarters and thus made the recommendation. He believes this is information that the line is not accounting for. So what is it about Ole Miss that is causing sharp cappers to believe that their performance against Bama will be much better than against previous opponents? And what information that isn't obvious to the public leads them to believe that Bama will have difficulty against Ole Miss that they have not experienced against their previous opponents?

they're back at home? playing a team that, beating, would make their season regardless of W/L overall. IDK shit about college football, I'm just sayin. I know Snead looks good one week and bad the next. possibly this is the source from which the angles are going. Someone thinks they've figured out he'll play good. What do you think of Snead?