Prof Meyer's Week Five NFL Side Play

Prof Meyer's Week Five NFL Side Play All trends and systems quoted below can be verified on-line using the SDQL. [B]Philadelphia +3' over SAN FRANCISCO[/B] -- The 49ers had all sorts of chances vs the Falcons last week, but lost to drop to 0-4 on the season. This is the first of five straight games in which the 49ers are very likely to be favored, with everyone else in their division at 2-2, they still have a reasonable chance to win the NFC West. Hell, a 6-10 record might be good enough. However, the fact remains that their defense put forth a supreme, all-out effort last week in an attempt to hang onto an early 14-0 lead, but Atlanta kicked a field goal with two seconds left to win 16-14 and leave the 49ers winless. That loss will be very difficult to recover from. Indeed, the league is 1-27 ATS at home when they are off a loss as a road dog vs a non-divisional opponent in which they were winning at the half, as long as they are not laying double digits. Last week this system cashed by playing against the Raiders. Here, the 49ers are in this spot and they are the play-against team. We have a couple of interesting scheduling trends that indicate Philadelphia is the play. The Eagles are 7-0 ATS after playing the Redskins, covering by an average of 20.0 ppg and 6-0 ATS when they get a team off a game vs the Falcons, covering by an average of 14.1 ppg. Nice margins. Philadelphia is off a disappointing game vs Washington, in McNabbâ•’s return. We'll give them a Mulligan for that one. Here, we note that Andy Reid's Eagles are the best team in the league to invest in when they are off a disappointing game. Philadelphia is 9-0 ATS when they are off a double-digit ATS loss, covering by an average of a whopping 14.8 ppg. They won every game straight up and each of the last five were double-digit wins. In week 15 last season, the 49ers marched into Philadelphia. They were an 8 point dog and they lost 27-13, while suffering from a 4-2 takeaway margin. San Francisco has revenge here, but the hard-nosed Eagles are a perfect 6-0 ATS when a non-divisional opponent is seeking revenge for a loss from the previous season in which they suffered a turnover margin of at least 2. Philadelphia has won these six games by an average of 16.8 ppg and covered by an average of 9.8 ppg. The 49ers' offense can't score any points and they keep committing turnovers -- yet they are still getting respect from the bettors. We can't figure it out -- especially this week when their defense should be mentally and physically exhausted after last week's heroic but fruitless performance. San Francisco is 0-9 ATS when they are off a game in which they committed at least three turnovers and scored fewer points than expected, falling short of expectations by an average of 14.5 ppg -- more than two touchdowns. The Eagles are really getting insulted by the linesmakers. They are undefeated (2-0) on the road this season yet they are a field-goal plus underdog to an 0-4 team. We expect the Eagles to respond favorably here and take advantage of a reeling 49ers team. Consider a moneyline play on Philadelphia as well. MTi's FORECAST: Philadelphia 27 SAN FRANCISCO 10 As always, comments welcome.
Hey Ed, Congrats on your winner. I was on the other side. I am not trying to be critical whatsoever as I appreciate you sharing your data with this forum. However, at least for me, it would make a big difference if the length of the trend or system play was stated. Sometimes I see a trend that says the "Eagles are 7-0 when....." but it is a 28 year-old team trend. Pertaining to the example, it is difficult for me to understand how the Eagles in 1981 playing the 49ers makes any difference on how the result will be in 2010. That being said, I always believe that it doesn't matter how somebody caps a game, the only result that matters is whether you win. Thank you for posting your plays and your analysis. I just would like to know the length of the trends/angles you state. Take care, Jim
[QUOTE=Kruger;29759]Hey Ed, Congrats on your winner. I was on the other side. I am not trying to be critical whatsoever as I appreciate you sharing your data with this forum. However, at least for me, it would make a big difference if the length of the trend or system play was stated. Sometimes I see a trend that says the "Eagles are 7-0 when....." but it is a 28 year-old team trend. Pertaining to the example, it is difficult for me to understand how the Eagles in 1981 playing the 49ers makes any difference on how the result will be in 2010. That being said, I always believe that it doesn't matter how somebody caps a game, the only result that matters is whether you win. Thank you for posting your plays and your analysis. I just would like to know the length of the trends/angles you state. Take care, Jim[/QUOTE] Jim, Thanks for the note. You are dead on point here. It is crucial to know the timeliness of any trend. I will include the search-from date on more of the trends I quote. Prof Meyer P.S. We never use a trend without looking at the game listing; we want to know how many games are from the recent past -- with the same coaching regime and player personnel. In fact, in our 2009 NFL Football Annual, we included 20 perfect trends in performance for each NFL team (640 trends) and every single one of them had at least one active date the previous season. We passed up a lot of 14-0, 15-0 and 16-0's simply because they were not active recently. I do the same thing when handicapping. If a trend hasn't been active recently, I don't use it in my decision-making process. That said, I might quote a trend in my write up that hasn't been active in over a season, but that is mainly to demonstrate the power of the SDQL. For example, in last night's side play on Philadelphia, The trend, "The Eagles are 6-0 ATS when they get a team off a game vs the Falcons," is merely "filler." However, this one: "Philadelphia is 9-0 ATS when they are off a double-digit ATS loss, covering by an average of a whopping 14.8 ppg. They won every game straight up and each of the last five were double-digit wins," was used in the decision-making process. When someone quotes a trend to me, the first two questions I have are, "What is the average margin?" and "What are the recent results?" Knowing that a team is 8-0 ATS in a particular situation is virtually useless by itself. Without information about the recent results and the average margin by which the team is covering the spread, the trend shouldn't be used to make handicapping decisions. Which is exactly your point. This is just my long-winded way of saying, I AGREE 100%.
Thanks for the clarification, Ed. I saw you are on a pretty nice run in the NFL. Keep up the good work! Jim