SB plays thread, and 1st play

[QUOTE=NoelCollis;39031]Does anyone think that the injury to Pittsburgh's center has a little noticed but potentially significant impact on the line?[/QUOTE] All I've heard for the last 10 days is everyone talking about this injury. We must be living on different planets.

What do you really think the significance is? O.K. guys- you have a legit point- "little noticed" was a bit of a gaffe on my part. Objectively speaking, what do you think the significance of this injury is? (I admit to not watching sports commentators or stock market analysts- but "little noticed" was not accurate- I appreciate the candid corrections)

It's overbuilt into the line, and it makes me want to take +3 +100 if it gets there.

Its a huge injury. Arguably the 2nd or 3rd most valuable player on the Steelers Offense. Against a 3-4 defense its even bigger. The Steelers have the stronger run game with Pouncey, without him who knows. Also, the center is normally responsible for calling out the O-line adjustments which against a 3-4 D is significant.

as predicted, 3s popped up I bet some +3 reduced......AND a bunch of -135 ml late on gb and +3-107 Pit.........lol

really , that was all fezz posted for super bowl 3-4 plays ? really?

I hear more picks were posted for stevefezzik.com subscribers. (Obviously, I am being facetious, but you can't be too careful. Seriously, Larry, did you not see his pregame analysis of Packers up early, Steelers make it close? There was a ton of valuable info on here for this game.)

Didn't the Rogers -1 completion over Rothlisberger first quarter prop hit? I had it Rogers 6 Ben 4, but 5 Dimes called it a push.

[QUOTE=gobucks;39140]Didn't the Rogers -1 completion over Rothlisberger first quarter prop hit? I had it Rogers 6 Ben 4, but 5 Dimes called it a push.[/QUOTE] It is 6-4 acoording to ESPN Play by Play.

Thanks...they fixed it