Sharp Snobbery Woof Woof

[QUOTE=tribecalledjeff;7488]It's been documented and it's been discussed on this site. I've been following him for 3 years. It's right. I've made the money and it's real. Believe it or not, I don't give 2 shits.[/QUOTE] RAS, who moves cbb totals (albeit a much smaller market) 3+ pts per game hits at a 60% rate. The guy can charge 10k for his picks. Somehow I think 67% is very fabricated.
[QUOTE=Justin1820;7490]RAS, who moves cbb totals (albeit a much smaller market) 3+ pts per game hits at a 60% rate. The guy can charge 10k for his picks. Somehow I think 67% is very fabricated.[/QUOTE] OK.............
From Pinnacle Pinny's definition of sharp: A sharp or professional player is one we expect will win in the long-term. How can we tell if any given player will be a consistent winner going forward? The most accurate way we have found is to compare the line a player received when they made their bet in relation to our closing line. If a player consistently beats our closing price at Pinnacle Sports, he is likely to be a long-term winner – period. Interestingly, we have found that this test is more reflective of a player’s future winning potential than their historical win/loss record with the company.
[QUOTE=Wannabee;7463]It seems to me that alot of you guys are really snobs when it comes to winning on dogs. Like, that's what makes a "sharp" vs a "square"...????...who gives a shit whether it takes a bet on a favorite or a dog, isn't the point to all of this to just make some $$$$$$$ ????[/QUOTE] That's just sooooooo 2006 ...

[QUOTE=Pick 4;7525]Pinny's definition of sharp ... .[/QUOTE] I think this was Daringly ghost-writing for Simon Noble.
[QUOTE=KimLee;7561]I think this was Daringly ghost-writing for Simon Noble.[/QUOTE] I always wondered who was the writer. Those Pinnacle Pulses were some of the best reads on gambling ever. Also, buried deep in one of the editions is a thank you to "Daringly and other sharps" (I'm paraphrasing), so I thought he may have something to do with it. I wish they would bring it back.