Total nonsense that CBA has anything to do with teams not as good off bye? Probably many of heard that Andy Reid's Eagles are 13-0 coming off a bye during his tenure. What I didn't know is that apparently he always gives his entire team off a full week (Ashely Fox article on ESPN) and even himself and the coaches take an extra break.
Alot of commentary on the board that the CBA is the reason for some of the disappointing results of some teams off the bye.
I have no idea what the answer is but once again it is the topics that come up on boards over and over: relatively small sample sizes just can't be used so that anyone can conclude that any team coming off a bye is being effected by the CBA.
Or, perhaps Andy Reid is an outlier and we can't conclude anything either. He is only 13-0. He keeps taking a full week off a bye and coaches for 13 more years he might end up 13-13. He might just be getting lucky. I say this half seriously. I don't know. Or maybe every team should take a full week off like Reid and 5 days is just a bad number of days to have off.