USC +10...Seems like alot of value

USC +10...Seems like alot of value Doesn't anybody else on this board see this line as wrong?

there will probably be more value when stanford gets put in every parlay sat

Usually a game like this that has line value, technical value, and public opinion heavily against it would seem to be the kind of game that sharps drive down early.

[QUOTE=theduke;29304]Doesn't anybody else on this board see this line as wrong?[/QUOTE] As I just stated in another post, I think the line is moving in the right direction. Washington was one of many teams that exposed USC's defense for being mediocre, which is surprising considering the pedigree of Monte Kiffin and his ability to purportedly scheme against pro style offenses. But there is a chemistry factor lacking in USC and Stanford is just the better side, playing at home in quest of a BCS birth and a history of beating this team. Stanford is a very physical team who will run the ball at will against USC and in the second half this should really take hold. USC is a trap play here in my opinion. That being said, this is the one Pac 10 play I have no action on as USC probably willhave more draft picks taken in April 2011 than any other Pac 10 conf. school...