The last month has left me with a very firm conclusion Winning betting, still isn't that difficult.
Winning more than 53.5% ON WIDELY AVAILABLE selections, is almost impossible in major sports. Yes, I have gotten RIDICULOUSLY unlucky the last 3 weeks, but I likely got lucky the first few weeks of the season.
The 'right' way to play NE/indy Philly/WASH, and Atl/Rams was to
lay the -3 on all the favorites when the lines were 3.1 and and clearly leaking up. THEN to come over the top with the other teams +3.5 or +4 reduced vig. EVERYONE I know who has accumulated small fortunes betting does exactly this (sometimes just playing 1 or the 2 sides, sometimes doing both)
And your edge is decent, your risk minimal if you play both sides, and you have winning season after season after season.........in fact, this is pretty much the way I've bet for the last 10 years.
But the mind plays tricks with you. When you know more than almost everyone else, and you are winning consistently you can convince yourself that you beat widely available lines. And have you put out GodAwful stupid plays like NE -4 since your reseach shows the Colts 0-5 SU, 0-5 ATS losing by an average of 8-31 in temps below 40. BUT.....the game was in 37 degrees, not 14. So the trend barely qualified. And even if it did.......
The WRONG way is to fool yourself (like I did this week) that a certain NFL side is the 'right' side, and you can play it at any number, and have a good wager.
More and more I'm on the phone with a helper, and when asked about a game like MNF Saying
"Denver, they are +10 -105? OMG. BET WHATEVER THEY WILL LET YOU"
"They are +10 -114? Garbage! No bet"
Guess what? 53% bets kick but -105, but they aren't very good at -110.