Week 6 Power Ratings

Week 6 Power Ratings NYG 100 Indianapolis 100 NO 99 Minnesota 99 Philadelphia 98 Baltimore 97 Pittsburg 97 NE 97 Chicago 96 Denver 95 Dallas 95 Atlanta 95 GB 94 SD 94 Arizona 94 Houston 93 SF 93 NYJ 93 Miami 92 Seattle 92 Cincinnati 92 Jacksonville 92 Tennessee 92 Washington 89 Carolina 89 Detroit 86 Buffalo 86 Cleveland 85 TB 84 KC 83 St Louis 82 Oakland 80 Teams + in TOs are 50-4 ATS!

I like it. Solid at the top and bottom. Only question I had is you have Houston tied with the Jets? Solid though.

[QUOTE=Old School;5688]NYG 100 Indianapolis 100 NO 99 Minnesota 99 Philadelphia 98 Baltimore 97 Pittsburg 97 NE 97 Chicago 96 Denver 95 Dallas 95 Atlanta 95 GB 94 SD 94 Arizona 94 Houston 93 SF 93 NYJ 93 Miami 92 Seattle 92 Cincinnati 92 Jacksonville 92 Tennessee 92 Washington 89 Carolina 89 Detroit 86 Buffalo 86 Cleveland 85 TB 84 KC 83 St Louis 82 Oakland 80 Teams + in TOs are 50-4 ATS![/QUOTE] Thanks O.S. 50-4 for teams + in TO's is something else. We need a formula for predicting that $$$. Any ideas Old School?

Teams with inferior QBs (like Oakland) tend to have more interceptions. Once one of the dregs with a poor QB falls behind, it's hard for them to come back. DDF are 9-2 so far TY.

Houston should have beaten Arizona at Arizona, and NYJ were lucky to lose to Miami by 4. Not much difference in NYJ and Houston IMO.

What's blacker than black & silver? Thanks again for the Power ratings..Great place to start. Nevertheless, consider that Oakland is in a class all to themselves. Nobody from the top in the Hilton Contest first 85 picks was involved last week in the Oakland/NYG game. To give them a rating beginning with an "8" doesn't do them justice and the other eight teams beginning with an 8 are shuddering with the implications. Lay the 14+ points again and rejoice until the bookmakers wake up. Possibly an opportunity that is so obvious it gets passed by without a comment anywhere OR I deserve what's coming....but Igot to do pull the trigger again..hello Philly.. "Cable's thoughts, though, are clear." "The issue is us," he said after surveying yet another performance that was worse than the last. "The question is how do we come to grips with it. It can't be about the Giants or the Eagles and what kind of teams they are. It has to be about us. We are the issue." Read more: https://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/12/SPGP1A4IS2.DTL :)

[QUOTE=49r;5715]Thanks again for the Power ratings..Great place to start. Nevertheless, consider that Oakland is in a class all to themselves. Nobody from the top in the Hilton Contest first 85 picks was involved last week in the Oakland/NYG game. To give them a rating beginning with an "8" doesn't do them justice and the other eight teams beginning with an 8 are shuddering with the implications. Lay the 14+ points again and rejoice until the bookmakers wake up. Possibly an opportunity that is so obvious it gets passed by without a comment anywhere OR I deserve what's coming....but Igot to do pull the trigger again..hello Philly.. "Cable's thoughts, though, are clear." "The issue is us," he said after surveying yet another performance that was worse than the last. "The question is how do we come to grips with it. It can't be about the Giants or the Eagles and what kind of teams they are. It has to be about us. We are the issue." Read more: https://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/12/SPGP1A4IS2.DTL :)[/QUOTE] I had NYG -15 1/2 LW. Oakland is 8-22 ATS at home, and Philadelphia is 13-5 ATS away.

[QUOTE=Old School;5704]Teams with inferior QBs (like Oakland) tend to have more interceptions. Once one of the dregs with a poor QB falls behind, it's hard for them to come back. DDF are 9-2 so far TY.[/QUOTE] O.S., what is DDF?

Double Digit Favorite [QUOTE=250 Gee;5770]O.S., what is DDF?[/QUOTE] Double Digit Favorite

Thanks MobileB.