This is not criticism, but something to think about.
Week after week, I watch you make your picks and they are dead accurate on the way the lines are going to move. There is absolutely huge value in that. The problem is, the past 2-3 years, a lot of sharps have gotten buried (After September) and the lines are still moving with the sharps.
I can't make an argument with data, but I watch week after week as you get beat by the good teams. (New England, Indy, Atlanta, etc). Every week, I watch your picks, watch the lines move, and then bet the other side on the faves (see my comment this week on Indy, a few weeks ago on NE vs the Bears). With the lines that keep coming out, I've been riding Indy, NE, and Atlanta and NE and GB overs. They just keep setting them too low.
You said it yourself earlier this year. 5 years ago, you said you would have gotten Browns +6 vs NE and this year you got 3 or 3.5. With that said, why not play more favorites and overs? You clearly are good enough at this to change your style a bit.
These were my bets yesterday - in years past, these would have been the squarest bets you could make, but given the way the lines are lower on both dogs and totals it seems (Totals are lower on 2Hs as well and buried me early in the season till I started playing essentially only overs) they are working last year and this year.
ATL O48.5, Balt -3, Jax U46, STL O39.5, NE O44, NE O26.5, NYJ O35.5, IN -1, NYG O43, Phil O36.5 (canceled), STL ML, NE -6.5, Balt U40. Those went very well. Unfortunatley, my wheel of teasers on Mia, SF, NE, NYJ, Balt, SD, NO, Jax kept it from being a great day.
Just food for thought. The NFL is very beatable, but times have really changed. I'd bet you hit 54% if you only post overs and favorites next year.
I'll likely add ATL -2 to my O48.5 tonight. No way the home fave should be less than 3.
-Sean