Winning Wednesday B+ Rating

Winning Wednesday B+ Rating GREAT show as always, great point by Ken about the Oak to Under par being the way to play it. As far as my critique: Ken stumbled a bit the first week, then KICKED ASS the next few shows, clearly he had prepped BIG TIME and gotten more comfortable. This week, I think he got very busy with other things and had a little less prep time, IMO. 1. Phil Steele got WAY WAY too much Credit on his Michigan play as the hosts said "Mich St-2 was great, BUT Phil had the right side too +4". Fezzik reply "No he didn't. He had Mich +2.5, the line on W when he recommended Michigan. A rare TERRIBLE selection. TERRIBLE!!!" Billy is sending him xmas cards for keeping this line below 3 for longer. 2. Ken may have a lemon IMO on Col/Tex UND 61 (we make it 63.1, and the mkt almost always closes agreeing with us). If you like under you likely get a 64 in Vegas at post. Good luck guys!!

I think this is a very fair and objective rating. I have further commments I made on this thread below at EOG... https://forums.eog.com/online-sportsbooks-and-gambling-discussion/fezzik-rates-winning-wednesdays-a-b-249343.html#post2442317 Feel free to reply back if you wish... Thanks for taking the time to critique "Winning Wednesdays..." P.S. I would be shocked if there are 64's on the Texas Total when it closes on Saturday... I also predict Arkansas closes + 1 1/2 or lower... THE SHRINK

Col/Tex now 59.

F for me on Col/Tex line move Let's turn the page over now to the Colo Defense and see the result I might add my understanding on the VI grading is that on games like Mich/MSU if it lands '3' it is amazing how the cappers seem to magically have all released at the right times, with lots of "W"s on the game.

Can we get an A- for Heaven's sake after today? :rolleyes:

Hell, i give you an A Got some correlated dog to under vs. a local in a local spot.

A+ to you and the Shrink today. I'm sittin on +17 and U38.5 at 2/1 I saved some for socks.

Really good job guys! The Nuts!

[QUOTE=Fezzik;5271] Got some correlated dog to under vs. a local in a local spot.[/QUOTE] No, you are THE MAN!!!! Now what about that "secret" play you received yesterday? Didn't that work our well for you too? ;) THE SHRINK

[QUOTE=Fezzik;5157]VI grading ... is amazing how the cappers seem to magically have all released at the right times.[/QUOTE] A former employee told me they switched to a system that lets cappers enter their own lines. In one case a capper entered a favorable line because he bet it before a line move, even though the pick was released after the move. Stephen Nover reported on Ken White hitting 70% in the Barley's contest. He was hitting near 50% on his VI picks, but supposedly hit near 100% on his extra unreleased picks. Rob Crowne then reported that some Barley's picks were actually opposite VI picks, at worse numbers. Wayne Root owns VI now, so what do you expect? I think SSB's official policy is that lines must be widely available, but in practice lets cappers choose the lines. Clearly Stanford and Goats can't verify real-time availability of overnight basketball lines, halftimes, and props. So you really need to trust the handicapper.