Maybe you could have Bet Phx on and explain why their book had gone so wrong.... Wow, -105 gets yanked away from any bettor with a brain.
Micro limits to any 'good' bettor.
We were all excited about Bet Phoenix -105 when it opened. NO LONGER!!
Seriously, I don't need a book that is not very good on the show. Have CRIS again, and have RAS!! VEry good.
Pps. I LOVE the picks, but the continuity is at times still missing. One week Duke is a solid play, the next week Duke Sucks.......almost as if you have forgotten that we all bet them and won the last week......need more transition thought as to why we are now fading them. The bet is right, the explanations shaky IMO.
This week, you talked about how Whisky kicked ass vs. Michigan dominating them. It seemed like it was forgotten that a play ON MICHIGAN had also just been suggested. Surely, if Whisky destroyed Michigan stat wise, we need more ammo/explanation about how we can throw that game into the garbage adn still play Mich vs. Ohio State IMO..........
I go back also to Phil Steele (the great expert) liking Mich +2 vs. MSU (good god, that was horrific by the way). After building the man up 'as the man', MSU -2 is given out as a best bet, no mention of Phil liking Michigan* Clearly, that hype on Phil Steele was just a bunch of false accolades, the hosts didn't really believe his opinion was worth much!! Despite all the talking up of the great guest, if Billy Walters likes a side, and Phil Steele the other, Phil is irrevelant, and not even worth a mention.
By the way, this was my main constructive critiscm of Larry Grossman who did a GREAT show. But he would have guests come on, and at time even disagree on a game, and Larry seemed to always be more into what he was saying than to realize the need to discuss the conflicting opinions, and point it out.
As for fading NWU, I took my shot in a great spot with ILL-5. AND PAID THE PRICE.
