The MRB

   I have a suggestion for the future configuring of MRB books - for ease of use, could the book be constructed in such a manner by region/location of coupons? Such as having all of the Downtown coupons in a section, the Strip coupons in another section, outlying casino coupons in another section, etc. It would sure make coupon runs easier and one would have have a better chance of not missing out on using an overlooked coupon while doing a coupon run. Just a suggestion...

That would introduce an element of confusion for those coupons for casinos (and bars and restaurants) that are neither on the Strip nor downtown, such as Henderson, the various locals' casinos, and outliers like South Point (and yes, I know that one's technically on the Strip).

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

That would introduce an element of confusion for those coupons for casinos (and bars and restaurants) that are neither on the Strip nor downtown, such as Henderson, the various locals' casinos, and outliers like South Point (and yes, I know that one's technically on the Strip).


     This "concern" was addressed by these words - "outlying casino coupons in another section, etc".

Not really. And what's the difference between a concern and a "concern"?


Originally posted by: David Miller

   I have a suggestion for the future configuring of MRB books - for ease of use, could the book be constructed in such a manner by region/location of coupons? Such as having all of the Downtown coupons in a section, the Strip coupons in another section, outlying casino coupons in another section, etc. It would sure make coupon runs easier and one would have have a better chance of not missing out on using an overlooked coupon while doing a coupon run. Just a suggestion...


That's a great suggestion, David.  Definitely makes the downtown run way easier.   Gonna do one in March.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Not really. And what's the difference between a concern and a "concern"?


  Quotation marks.

Ah, so the marks were meaningless. Thank you.

Edited on Jan 19, 2024 8:54pm
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Ah, so the marks were meaningless. Thank you.


      Apparently you have to make everything I post contentious. I used quotation marks for emphasis - they are not "meaningless". 

Originally posted by: David Miller

      Apparently you have to make everything I post contentious. I used quotation marks for emphasis - they are not "meaningless". 


You didn't use them for emphasis--when you want to do that, you in particular LUVVVVV to put words in Trumpian ALL CAPITALS. What you used them for was to make a snide comment on the concern I expressed about the LVA coupon groupings. That's what your "emphasis" actually was. Try being honest for once.

 

And super bonus tip--if you don't like contention, don't contend.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

You didn't use them for emphasis--when you want to do that, you in particular LUVVVVV to put words in Trumpian ALL CAPITALS. What you used them for was to make a snide comment on the concern I expressed about the LVA coupon groupings. That's what your "emphasis" actually was. Try being honest for once.

 

And super bonus tip--if you don't like contention, don't contend.


        Once again, I made a suggestion and now it has become contentious. 

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now