Quote
Originally posted by: drmilled
O2bnVegas - Quoting you " Not good that you insulted the lady and the company" - I take umbridge with your comment, after all, she asked and I honestly replied. Citing "customer convenience" for an unasked for and unwanted service and fee that only padded their bottom line was and is B.S. - as I stated. I should be and was the one insulted.
Originally posted by: drmilled
O2bnVegas - Quoting you " Not good that you insulted the lady and the company" - I take umbridge with your comment, after all, she asked and I honestly replied. Citing "customer convenience" for an unasked for and unwanted service and fee that only padded their bottom line was and is B.S. - as I stated. I should be and was the one insulted.
No umbridge intended. I'd bet Crissy is a low level 'customer service' rep who was handed your survey to follow up on. At this point, language like "total BS" and "nothing but a money grab" doesn't give the boss anything to ponder from a business standpoint.
A better reply: "The "Roadside Assistance" item on the Payless rental contract incurs a cost to the customer without the opportunity to accept or reject it. The cost/benefit ratio is glaringly without value to the consumer who rents for more than a few days. I ask that you revise this to make "Roadside Assistance" an optional selection for the renter, not a default cost for which the renter has no choice. Customers will find this more acceptable than the current process. Thank you. I look forward to hearing back from your management team on this matter."
This is a statement of fact, suggested action, and how it may benefit the company. Plus you've asked for a reply from someone higher in the organization.
Probably an exercise in futility, but, again, you get your point across, and perhaps improve that process for all unsuspecting Payless renters!