Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

4 days till our long national nightmare is over.

Iamrice
Iamrice
Nov 5, 2016
6:23am
Block User
All of the furniture was old and scratched up.
chafraho
chafraho
Nov 5, 2016
7:11am
Block User
This is just the pre-sleep, worried-about-the-monsters-in-the-dark stage. The nightmares don't begin until later.
malibber2
malibber2
Nov 5, 2016
7:15am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
Look at how the market reacts to the mere possiblity of a Trump preisidentcy. .
You told us Hillary was going to win by double digits with a 'mandate'. Heck, Forkush told us yesterday that Hillary had already won and President Obama was only on the stump to help Democrats win congress.

Using your logic, this stock market downturn must be a reaction to the strong possibility of a Hillary victory.


I predicted a 7-point win not a double digit win Alan. I also didn’t anticipate the director of FBI willingness to commit an illegal act. Who knows maybe America will finally get its Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, ect.
Stewart
Stewart
Nov 5, 2016
4:31pm
Block User
SICK!

forkushV
forkushV
Nov 5, 2016
10:26pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
Look at how the market reacts to the mere possiblity of a Trump preisidentcy. .
You told us Hillary was going to win by double digits with a 'mandate'. Heck, Forkush told us yesterday that Hillary had already won and President Obama was only on the stump to help Democrats win congress...
No one said "mandate."
Malibber didn't predict a doubl digit victory.

So the above is about half-right; still, better than your average.

Hey look...Someone did say 'mandate' and speculate on a Hillary 'win by 10 to 15 points'....in the same sentence! At some point, it must start to hurt to be so smug and so wrong so much.

Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
If she wins by 10 to 15 points, it hard to see her not having a mandate


From malibber2's classic thread:

I think it is safe to say trump is in full meltdown mode now
So now starting a sentence with the word "if" is making a prediction. Okay.

And the word "mandate" has been rendered meaningless. In 2004 Bush won by 2.5% and it was called a "mandate," but when Obama won by almost 7 it wasn't.
lvfritz
lvfritz
Nov 6, 2016
1:27am
Block User
I got Forkie 'guaranteeing' a win......I got Mali having Liarry by 7.
This is your brain, this is.......

I have no idea who is going to win. Both candidates suck. All I know is that one of them has NEVER spoken of their record of achievements......that's the one I hope doesn't win.

Come Wednesday morning the only people who are going to be happy are the lawyers. Because they will be kept busy pressing charges against whoever wins for years.
alanleroyII
alanleroyII
Nov 6, 2016
1:43am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
Look at how the market reacts to the mere possiblity of a Trump preisidentcy. .
You told us Hillary was going to win by double digits with a 'mandate'. Heck, Forkush told us yesterday that Hillary had already won and President Obama was only on the stump to help Democrats win congress...
No one said "mandate."
Malibber didn't predict a doubl digit victory.

So the above is about half-right; still, better than your average.

Hey look...Someone did say 'mandate' and speculate on a Hillary 'win by 10 to 15 points'....in the same sentence! At some point, it must start to hurt to be so smug and so wrong so much.

Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
If she wins by 10 to 15 points, it hard to see her not having a mandate


From malibber2's classic thread:

I think it is safe to say trump is in full meltdown mode now
So now starting a sentence with the word "if" is making a prediction. Okay.

And the word "mandate" has been rendered meaningless. In 2004 Bush won by 2.5% and it was called a "mandate," but when Obama won by almost 7 it wasn't.

Leave it to Forky to argue about what the word 'If Is'. If you look at the context of malibber's post, it's pretty clear he was predicting a large Clinton Victory...Speculating about a 'Mandate and a 10 -15 point win'.

But then you also claimed:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV

No one said "mandate."


And now you claim:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV

And the word "mandate" has been rendered meaningless


Like most of your rants you are merely weasel wording and nit picking rather than actually responding to the real point....which you always seem to miss.

The real point was that malibber and others are blaming the recent stock market declines on the possibility of a Trump presidency. Yet you and malibber have already gone on record claiming that wasn't possible. So if we use his logic...this market decline must be due to the great probability of a Hillary win.

Or here's another theory---Perhaps malibber also blamed the probability of a Candidate Obama win in 2008 for the 3,000 point Dow decline between October and November 2008....because he is so consistent in his analysis of stock market declines based on the probability of presidential candidates being elected. Nope. I'm sure that was blamed on Bush. So maybe he can at least blame Obama or Hillary for the current downturn, just to be consistent in his thinking.

Then again...maybe you guys are just fearmongering....Stock Market Crash--Trump is Hitler---KKK--The Sky is Falling! Of course the other team does it too---The 'Cough'---Indictment---Corruption--Impeachment. They just aren't as subtle. There's nothing like calling a candidate Hitler to get a good political discussion going.


forkushV
forkushV
Nov 6, 2016
4:09am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
Look at how the market reacts to the mere possiblity of a Trump preisidentcy. .
You told us Hillary was going to win by double digits with a 'mandate'. Heck, Forkush told us yesterday that Hillary had already won and President Obama was only on the stump to help Democrats win congress...
No one said "mandate."
Malibber didn't predict a doubl digit victory.

So the above is about half-right; still, better than your average.

Hey look...Someone did say 'mandate' and speculate on a Hillary 'win by 10 to 15 points'....in the same sentence! At some point, it must start to hurt to be so smug and so wrong so much.

Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
If she wins by 10 to 15 points, it hard to see her not having a mandate


From malibber2's classic thread:

I think it is safe to say trump is in full meltdown mode now
So now starting a sentence with the word "if" is making a prediction. Okay.

And the word "mandate" has been rendered meaningless. In 2004 Bush won by 2.5% and it was called a "mandate," but when Obama won by almost 7 it wasn't.

Leave it to Forky to argue about what the word 'If Is'. If you look at the context of malibber's post, it's pretty clear he was predicting a large Clinton Victory...Speculating about a 'Mandate and a 10 -15 point win'.

But then you also claimed:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV

No one said "mandate."


And now you claim:

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV

And the word "mandate" has been rendered meaningless


Like most of your rants you are merely weasel wording and nit picking rather than actually responding to the real point....which you always seem to miss.

The real point was that malibber and others are blaming the recent stock market declines on the possibility of a Trump presidency. Yet you and malibber have already gone on record claiming that wasn't possible. So if we use his logic...this market decline must be due to the great probability of a Hillary win.

Or here's another theory---Perhaps malibber also blamed the probability of a Candidate Obama win in 2008 for the 3,000 point Dow decline between October and November 2008....because he is so consistent in his analysis of stock market declines based on the probability of presidential candidates being elected. Nope. I'm sure that was blamed on Bush. So maybe he can at least blame Obama or Hillary for the current downturn, just to be consistent in his thinking.

Then again...maybe you guys are just fearmongering....Stock Market Crash--Trump is Hitler---KKK--The Sky is Falling! Of course the other team does it too---The 'Cough'---Indictment---Corruption--Impeachment. They just aren't as subtle. There's nothing like calling a candidate Hitler to get a good political discussion going.
Speaking for myself, I am doing the opposite of fear mongering . I'm saying that Hillary's got this. Guaranteed . Nothing to worry about.

pjstroh
pjstroh
Nov 6, 2016
7:32am
Block User
https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/05/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-protester/

This is how our sitting president handled a Trump supporter who interrupted one of his campaign events this week.
"We live in a country that respects free speech. Second of all, it looks like maybe he might have served in our military and we've got to respect that," Obama said. "Third of all, he was elderly and we've got to respect our elders."


There are two things Obama is that Donald Trump will never be
1) A decent human being
2) President of the United States

malibber2
malibber2
Nov 6, 2016
7:58am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/05/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-protester/

This is how our sitting president handled a Trump supporter who interrupted one of his campaign events this week.
"We live in a country that respects free speech. Second of all, it looks like maybe he might have served in our military and we've got to respect that," Obama said. "Third of all, he was elderly and we've got to respect our elders."


There are two things Obama is that Donald Trump will never be
1) A decent human being
2) President of the United States


Meanwhile, in Reno, Trump supporters jumped on and started kicking and punching a Republican that was a never Trumper as Donald was speaking. It got so out of hand the Secret Service had to intervene.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now