Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Minimum wage has not kept up with inflation. If it did it would be over $10/hour today...which would also lift those respective workers out of poverty.
Explain to me how "giving poor people money" is different from " our bloated system of income redistribution".
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroyQuote
Originally posted by: jillyfQuoteWell, I can think of one way … MAGIC!! Hurray!
Originally posted by: alanleroy
If the problem you're really trying to solve is Poverty, there are far better ways to solve that than by distorting the market for labor.
(I would say voodoo, but we all know that's a load of bull.)
The USA has had minimum wage laws for 75 years. And yet there are now 47 million Americans living in poverty. That's obviously not a solution to poverty. In fact, it guarantees that those most in need of a job will never find one because they are priced out of the market for labor.
It's actually far better to get rid of every State, Local and Federal Government program for the poor...get rid of the minimum wage..AND JUST GIVE POOR PEOPLE MONEY. Sure, some will be content to live on the dole..But, hey I just solved the problem of Poverty in the USA and saved billions of dollars by eliminating our bloated system of income redistribution....and it didn't take me 50 years.
And guess who's against such a program...Republican and Democrat politicians. There you go. It must be good.
Minimum wage has not kept up with inflation. If it did it would be over $10/hour today...which would also lift those respective workers out of poverty.
Explain to me how "giving poor people money" is different from " our bloated system of income redistribution".
1. What about all of the workers who don't get jobs or lose their jobs because their skills aren't worth $10 an hour? Also, using your logic, if the only issue is that we didn't index minimum wage to inflation, then when the minimum wage was established it would have eliminated poverty. That didn't happen. Eliminating the minimum wage eliminates unemployment. Eliminating Poverty is another topic.
2. In my scenario, you have one program that directly gives people money. The current system of income redistribution has thousands of programs staffed by hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats. Some of these programs are redundant. Some of these programs are ineffective. Many of these programs are inefficient. All of these programs have different rules, different methods of funding, different thresholds, different applications and objectives. Just show them the money and eliminate poverty....if that's the real objective.
3. My real objective was to point out that there many different views on what questions we should really be asking and what answers are appropriate. In fact the concept of addressing poverty by giving the poor money through a single direct payment was advanced by that bastion of liberal thinking...Milton Friedman.
It's not....Either you support the minimum wage or you hate poor people as most PJ examples seem to indicate.

