Another Terrorist attack

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
ISIS is a legitimate threat and should be addressed. And so are right wing extremists. And The latter have committed more confirmed acts of terror in the US since 9/11. Unfortunately liberal-hack magazine "Newsweek's" reporting of these confirmed incidents of violence is not strong enough to penetrate the tinfoil bubble Hoops live in. And you can certainly bet Hoop's endorsement of profiling will not extend to people who have easily stereotyped attributes of right wing nutjobs.

I really cant assist with that other than to point out the hypocrisy
Right. But, Let's just leave out 9/11 in our statistical analysis...because....why?. Didn't happen? Doesn't matter? If your go ahead and include that little fact it's 64 to 1 Islamic Terrorist vs Right Wing Extremist.

If you leave out 9/11 and just update your statistics to include the 50 people killed in Orlando you'll see Islamic Terrorism has far outweighed 'Right Wing Extremist' terrorism....especially in the last 2 years. If you look internationally 90% of terrorism is Islamic Extremism. But no. PJ buries his head in the sand....Trusting Newsweek to save him. He may want to invest in his own tinfoil bubble.

Everything was Bush's fault for the first six years of Obama's presidency, but somehow this is Trump's fault prior to even becoming president. How funny Liberals are!

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
But Trump promised to stop these. Where was he?


Quote

Originally posted by: krajewski.sa
He also deported 2.5 Million illegals. That's more than W.


As with many obama stats, not quite accurate as after obama took office they started counting people stopped at the border as a deportation, where prior to obama those returned from border stops were not counted.

When we add back in border returns the number of deportations have gone down.

"And The latter have committed more confirmed acts of terror in the US since 9/11"

Ignored are the number of muslim attacks that have either failed or been stopped, such as the Jersey Shore bomb that went off prematurely. Also overlooked is that there only 3m muslims in this country, so the likelihood of one of them being a terrorist is much higher

Once again, Obama and Friends intentionally mislead Americans. Under liberal math, 1 illegal alien could have been deported 2.5 million times, and that's much closer to the truth than Obama deporting 2.5 million different people.


q]Originally posted by: krajewski.sa
He also deported 2.5 Million illegals. That's more than W.


Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
ISIS is a legitimate threat and should be addressed. And so are right wing extremists. And The latter have committed more confirmed acts of terror in the US since 9/11. Unfortunately liberal-hack magazine "Newsweek's" reporting of these confirmed incidents of violence is not strong enough to penetrate the tinfoil bubble Hoops live in. And you can certainly bet Hoop's endorsement of profiling will not extend to people who have easily stereotyped attributes of right wing nutjobs.

I really cant assist with that other than to point out the hypocrisy
Right. But, Let's just leave out 9/11 in our statistical analysis...because....why?. Didn't happen? Doesn't matter? If your go ahead and include that little fact it's 64 to 1 Islamic Terrorist vs Right Wing Extremist.

If you leave out 9/11 and just update your statistics to include the 50 people killed in Orlando you'll see Islamic Terrorism has far outweighed 'Right Wing Extremist' terrorism....especially in the last 2 years. If you look internationally 90% of terrorism is Islamic Extremism. But no. PJ buries his head in the sand....Trusting Newsweek to save him. He may want to invest in his own tinfoil bubble.


or we can go back to the OK City bombing...or even the Original WTC bombing.....or whatever date makes Alan's hemorrhoids flare up less.

But in any event I think we should have one policy to fight terrorism regardless of its origins. But if that policy entails discriminating against the rights of those who share a common diety with terrorists than we'll likely be discriminating against Hoops and AlanLeroy....unless you have different standards.

Hoops does ....and apparently you do too.


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
ISIS is a legitimate threat and should be addressed. And so are right wing extremists. And The latter have committed more confirmed acts of terror in the US since 9/11. Unfortunately liberal-hack magazine "Newsweek's" reporting of these confirmed incidents of violence is not strong enough to penetrate the tinfoil bubble Hoops live in. And you can certainly bet Hoop's endorsement of profiling will not extend to people who have easily stereotyped attributes of right wing nutjobs.

I really cant assist with that other than to point out the hypocrisy
Right. But, Let's just leave out 9/11 in our statistical analysis...because....why?. Didn't happen? Doesn't matter? If your go ahead and include that little fact it's 64 to 1 Islamic Terrorist vs Right Wing Extremist.

If you leave out 9/11 and just update your statistics to include the 50 people killed in Orlando you'll see Islamic Terrorism has far outweighed 'Right Wing Extremist' terrorism....especially in the last 2 years. If you look internationally 90% of terrorism is Islamic Extremism. But no. PJ buries his head in the sand....Trusting Newsweek to save him. He may want to invest in his own tinfoil bubble.


or we can go back to the OK City bombing...or even the Original WTC bombing.....or whatever date makes Alan's hemorrhoids flare up less.

But in any event I think we should have one policy to fight terrorism regardless of its origins. But if that policy entails discriminating against the rights of those who share a common diety with terrorists than we'll likely be discriminating against Hoops and AlanLeroy....unless you have different standards.

Hoops does ....and apparently you do too.
Hey...I'm just debunking your false statement that "The latter have committed more confirmed acts of terror in the US since 9/11" which is untrue...and also questioning why that analysis conveniently leaves out the largest single terrorist attack in human history....and also fails to recognize that the vast majority of terrorist acts (90%) in this world are perpetrated by Islamic Radicals.

As someone else pointed out, that's a lot of terrorism in the US for such a relatively small group of people (Compared to Christians for example). If you aren't willing to recognize that, then you are essentially hiding your head in the sand.

And for the record, I recognize no 'diety'...(except maybe Atkins). Ok...I don't have a deity either. I'm religiously neutral.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
ISIS is a legitimate threat and should be addressed. And so are right wing extremists. And The latter have committed more confirmed acts of terror in the US since 9/11. Unfortunately liberal-hack magazine "Newsweek's" reporting of these confirmed incidents of violence is not strong enough to penetrate the tinfoil bubble Hoops live in. And you can certainly bet Hoop's endorsement of profiling will not extend to people who have easily stereotyped attributes of right wing nutjobs.

I really cant assist with that other than to point out the hypocrisy


So even if there are as many "right wing extremists" attacks (funny, I don't see that many in the news unless MAL's posting of the berating of a barista?), why in the world would anyone want to increase the caseload for the FBI?

The kid who shot the 9 black people in the bible study was a POS and definitely a right wing nut, but is the annoying guy on the plane a "right wing terrorist" categorized as well?
Whew, for a minute there I thought the domestic terrorists that are the TaliBundy Clan escaped from prison.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
We'll soon get to see how President Trump deals with these kinds of situations. Is he going to be thoughtful and target the problem? or will he embrace Hoops' philosophy of stereotyping millions of people in the US? I honestly don't know.


Like the internment of Japanese citizens during WWII?
Limiting the number in immigrants during the 1920's and 1930's?
Deported 7,000 Iranian students during the hostage crisis and banned any new immigrants from Iran?

PJ may wish to check the history of immigration in the US as US President's have banned certain people from specific countries from entering this country on a number of occasions and for a variety of reasons.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now