Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

The Appropriate Application of Concealed Carry

CowboyKell
CowboyKell
Oct 12, 2015
2:27am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
This wasn't a "blind squirrel finding an acorn" event...
Oh, do you prefer unicorn sighting?

Tell you what, I'll give you (or DonDiego or jatki or etc.) a dollar for every good guy gunslinger that the NRA can dig up, and you give me a buck for every accidental shooting, domestic violence shooting, suicide shooting, small child getting a hold of a gun and..., well you get the picture.

That probably isn't fair to you, is it? Maybe you should get $5 or $10 or $20 for every one of these good guy with a gun rarities, and pay a buck when the gun owner ends up offing a member of his own family. Nope, you'd still lose money, wouldn't you?


Here Forkush, read this.
harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy

The commentaries are almost all by "right wing" media sources so I direct you to the paper itself which is unbiased, factual and overly reviewed.
jatki
jatki
Oct 12, 2015
2:48am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
This wasn't a "blind squirrel finding an acorn" event...
Oh, do you prefer unicorn sighting?

Tell you what, I'll give you (or DonDiego or jatki or etc.) a dollar for every good guy gunslinger that the NRA can dig up, and you give me a buck for every accidental shooting, domestic violence shooting, suicide shooting, small child getting a hold of a gun and..., well you get the picture.

That probably isn't fair to you, is it? Maybe you should get $5 or $10 or $20 for every one of these good guy with a gun rarities, and pay a buck when the gun owner ends up offing a member of his own family. Nope, you'd still lose money, wouldn't you?


How about compare them to deaths by accidental falls every year?( 30,208). How about accidental poisonings?(38,851). Such silly comparisons you came up with.

If you want to compare actual apples to apples you could compare lives lost to these mass shooters to the lives saved by CCW individuals. Therein lies a rub, you don't know, nor do I. If it was even a fraction of those lost, is it worth it to save ten waffle eating lives?,or would you rather the total keep racking up?
chefantwon
chefantwon
Oct 12, 2015
10:06am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
This wasn't a "blind squirrel finding an acorn" event...
Oh, do you prefer unicorn sighting?

Tell you what, I'll give you (or DonDiego or jatki or etc.) a dollar for every good guy gunslinger that the NRA can dig up, and you give me a buck for every accidental shooting, domestic violence shooting, suicide shooting, small child getting a hold of a gun and..., well you get the picture.

That probably isn't fair to you, is it? Maybe you should get $5 or $10 or $20 for every one of these good guy with a gun rarities, and pay a buck when the gun owner ends up offing a member of his own family. Nope, you'd still lose money, wouldn't you?


Here Forkush, read this.
harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy

The commentaries are almost all by "right wing" media sources so I direct you to the paper itself which is unbiased, factual and overly reviewed.


A soda says Forkie will dismiss it....
forkushV
forkushV
Oct 12, 2015
11:11am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
This wasn't a "blind squirrel finding an acorn" event...
Oh, do you prefer unicorn sighting?

Tell you what, I'll give you (or DonDiego or jatki or etc.) a dollar for every good guy gunslinger that the NRA can dig up, and you give me a buck for every accidental shooting, domestic violence shooting, suicide shooting, small child getting a hold of a gun and..., well you get the picture.

That probably isn't fair to you, is it? Maybe you should get $5 or $10 or $20 for every one of these good guy with a gun rarities, and pay a buck when the gun owner ends up offing a member of his own family. Nope, you'd still lose money, wouldn't you?


Here Forkush, read this.
from a student published journal which claims to be "the nation’s leading forum for CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERTARIAN legal scholarship" that has published the opinions of Ron Paul and Ted Cruz and similar. Or as CowboyKell would say.......wait for it.........unbiased!

The commentaries are almost all by "right wing" media sources so I direct you to the paper itself which is unbiased, factual and overly reviewed.
Fixed!


CowboyKell
CowboyKell
Oct 13, 2015
3:11am
Block User
All Law reviews are student published. Published by the best minds in American law. Way smarter than the law minds that go into politics (or journalism). These student published law reviews are
NOT forums in the interactive sense. They are cited and used by judges all the way to the Supreme Court. Whether they are considered liberal or conservative is made by outside viewers. All reviews, especially the top ten, are fact checked and reviewed to an extreme level. They are peer reviewed by assenters and dissenters alike.
The citations are all there, it cannot be more open and forthcoming. You might not like the truth, but the truth it is.

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
This wasn't a "blind squirrel finding an acorn" event...
Oh, do you prefer unicorn sighting?

Tell you what, I'll give you (or DonDiego or jatki or etc.) a dollar for every good guy gunslinger that the NRA can dig up, and you give me a buck for every accidental shooting, domestic violence shooting, suicide shooting, small child getting a hold of a gun and..., well you get the picture.

That probably isn't fair to you, is it? Maybe you should get $5 or $10 or $20 for every one of these good guy with a gun rarities, and pay a buck when the gun owner ends up offing a member of his own family. Nope, you'd still lose money, wouldn't you?


Here Forkush, read this.
from a student published journal which claims to be "the nation’s leading forum for CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERTARIAN legal scholarship" that has published the opinions of Ron Paul and Ted Cruz and similar. Or as CowboyKell would say.......wait for it.........unbiased!

The commentaries are almost all by "right wing" media sources so I direct you to the paper itself which is unbiased, factual and overly reviewed.
Fixed!


peer reviewed
forkushV
forkushV
Oct 13, 2015
9:24am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
All Law reviews are student published. Published by the best minds in American law. Way smarter than the law minds that go into politics (or journalism). These student published law reviews are
NOT forums in the interactive sense. They are cited and used by judges all the way to the Supreme Court. Whether they are considered liberal or conservative is made by outside viewers. All reviews, especially the top ten, are fact checked and reviewed to an extreme level. They are peer reviewed by assenters and dissenters alike.
The citations are all there, it cannot be more open and forthcoming. You might not like the truth, but the truth it is.

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
This wasn't a "blind squirrel finding an acorn" event...
Oh, do you prefer unicorn sighting?

Tell you what, I'll give you (or DonDiego or jatki or etc.) a dollar for every good guy gunslinger that the NRA can dig up, and you give me a buck for every accidental shooting, domestic violence shooting, suicide shooting, small child getting a hold of a gun and..., well you get the picture.

That probably isn't fair to you, is it? Maybe you should get $5 or $10 or $20 for every one of these good guy with a gun rarities, and pay a buck when the gun owner ends up offing a member of his own family. Nope, you'd still lose money, wouldn't you?


Here Forkush, read this.
from a student published journal which claims to be "the nation’s leading forum for CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERTARIAN legal scholarship" that has published the opinions of Ron Paul and Ted Cruz and similar. Or as CowboyKell would say.......wait for it.........unbiased!

The commentaries are almost all by "right wing" media sources so I direct you to the paper itself which is unbiased, factual and overly reviewed.
Fixed!


peer reviewed
You said "unbiased" about a journal that calls itself conservative, that publishes articles from Ron Paul and Ted Cruz, and that is the official publication for the right wing Federalist Society. Embarrassed much? Are you really going to stick by that story?
CowboyKell
CowboyKell
Oct 13, 2015
12:23pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV]
You said "unbiased" about a journal that calls itself conservative, that publishes articles from Ron Paul and Ted Cruz, and that is the official publication for the right wing Federalist Society. Embarrassed much? Are you really going to stick by that story?


It is as unbiased as anything you get your information from.

The cites are all right there for you to check or dispute. Is it or is it not the truth?

Now back to that blind squirrel. It's easy to find an acorn if your in a dense Oak forest with a bumper crop of acorns.

alanleroyII
alanleroyII
Oct 14, 2015
12:22am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV]
You said "unbiased" about a journal that calls itself conservative, that publishes articles from Ron Paul and Ted Cruz, and that is the official publication for the right wing Federalist Society. Embarrassed much? Are you really going to stick by that story?


It is as unbiased as anything you get your information from.

The cites are all right there for you to check or dispute. Is it or is it not the truth?

Now back to that blind squirrel. It's easy to find an acorn if your in a dense Oak forest with a bumper crop of acorns.

Forkush was for peer reviewed research before he was against it.

forkushV
forkushV
Oct 14, 2015
2:14am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV]
You said "unbiased" about a journal that calls itself conservative, that publishes articles from Ron Paul and Ted Cruz, and that is the official publication for the right wing Federalist Society. Embarrassed much? Are you really going to stick by that story?


It is as unbiased as anything you get your information from.
Thanks Spiro

Back to the question you don't want to answer, CowboyKell. Is you self described conservative law journal that publishes only right wing articles unbiased like you claimed?

Please answer soon, because pretty soon some really dishonest person is bound to compare peer review in the physical sciences, where bias and advocacy is weeded out, with peer review of a law journal, where bias and advocacy is encouraged, and is in fact the whole point.

Oh wait, it's too late. See post above.
Boilerman
Boilerman
Oct 14, 2015
2:44am
Block User
Is Forkie accusing Cowboy of stealing a "dodge tactic" from directly from the LVA Liberal playbook? This is mean of you, and of course not accurate.


Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV]
You said "unbiased" about a journal that calls itself conservative, that publishes articles from Ron Paul and Ted Cruz, and that is the official publication for the right wing Federalist Society. Embarrassed much? Are you really going to stick by that story?


It is as unbiased as anything you get your information from.
Thanks Spiro

Back to the question you don't want to answer, CowboyKell. Is you self described conservative law journal that publishes only right wing articles unbiased like you claimed?

Please answer soon, because pretty soon some really dishonest person is bound to compare peer review in the physical sciences, where bias and advocacy is weeded out, with peer review of a law journal, where bias and advocacy is encouraged, and is in fact the whole point.

Oh wait, it's too late. See post above.


Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now