As per usual you are avoiding the point. Also, in this case I believe you are woefully misinformed on the nature of Law Reviews.
A Law Review Editor can pick and choose the articles for print. This can make a specific journal more conservative or more liberal in what it publishes. However, and this is where you err, The content of each article is unbiased in that it is the truth. All Law Review articles are vetted to the n'th degree. They are fact checked and reviewed (hence the name) many times by many people. Fact checkers and jr. editors of dissenting views are ALWAYS used. (Much unlike modern scientific "peer reviewed" papers.) To take this further, if not a "conservative" journal, who would publish these true facts? Should we wait for the New York or L.A. Times to publish it?
So, to answer your question. Yes, the facts of the paper are unbiased.
Are you?
A Law Review Editor can pick and choose the articles for print. This can make a specific journal more conservative or more liberal in what it publishes. However, and this is where you err, The content of each article is unbiased in that it is the truth. All Law Review articles are vetted to the n'th degree. They are fact checked and reviewed (hence the name) many times by many people. Fact checkers and jr. editors of dissenting views are ALWAYS used. (Much unlike modern scientific "peer reviewed" papers.) To take this further, if not a "conservative" journal, who would publish these true facts? Should we wait for the New York or L.A. Times to publish it?
So, to answer your question. Yes, the facts of the paper are unbiased.
Are you?
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
It is as unbiased as anything you get your information from.
Thanks Spiro
Back to the question you don't want to answer, CowboyKell. Is you self described conservative law journal that publishes only right wing articles unbiased like you claimed?
Please answer soon, because pretty soon some really dishonest person is bound to compare peer review in the physical sciences, where bias and advocacy is weeded out, with peer review of a law journal, where bias and advocacy is encouraged, and is in fact the whole point.
Oh wait, it's too late. See post above.
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKellQuoteYou said "unbiased" about a journal that calls itself conservative, that publishes articles from Ron Paul and Ted Cruz, and that is the official publication for the right wing Federalist Society. Embarrassed much? Are you really going to stick by that story?
Originally posted by: forkushV]
It is as unbiased as anything you get your information from.
Thanks Spiro
Back to the question you don't want to answer, CowboyKell. Is you self described conservative law journal that publishes only right wing articles unbiased like you claimed?
Please answer soon, because pretty soon some really dishonest person is bound to compare peer review in the physical sciences, where bias and advocacy is weeded out, with peer review of a law journal, where bias and advocacy is encouraged, and is in fact the whole point.
Oh wait, it's too late. See post above.
ALWAYS
