Aurora shooting victims that sued theater ordered to pay $700k

Four survivors of the 2012 Aurora movie theater massacre have been ordered to pay Cinemark $700,000 in legal fees after a judge ruled the theater chain was not liable for the shooting.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the survivors had filed a federal lawsuit against the theater chain, alleging the Aurora theater’s lax security protocols led to the July 20, 2012 shooting attack in which 12 people were killed and 70 injured after gunman James Holmes opened fire during a screening of The Dark Knight Rises.

In May, a judge had reportedly warned the more than three-dozen plaintiffs in the suit that he was prepared to rule that Cinemark was not liable for the deaths, as the theater could not have predicted what Holmes would do. The judge reportedly urged the parties to settle, and Cinemark offered a settlement: $150,000, to be split between the 41 plaintiffs.

But four of the victims — including one who reportedly lost a child in the shooting, became paralyzed and lost another child she was carrying— remained on.


I think this a proper verdict. It's not the theater's fault. It's not the gun's fault. It's the shooter's fault.
Cinemark won at trial, and, in June, submitted a $700,000 legal bill. A judge this week ruled that the four plaintiffs who had remained on were liable to repay it.
Proper verdict.

But I'm confused:
Did the 41 accept the settlement offer?
Are they off the hook for part of the $700K?

And, just curious, what made it a Federal case?
Seems proper indeed.......If this type of arrangement were in place nationwide, we would see far less frivolous law suits!
Quote

Originally posted by: O2bnVegas
Proper verdict.

But I'm confused:
Did the 41 accept the settlement offer?
Are they off the hook for part of the $700K?

And, just curious, what made it a Federal case?


What I read said that one of the plaintiffs rejected the offer from the theater therefore voided the offer for all. After being told they could be on the hook for attorney fees if they lost, only 4 chose to go forward with the lawsuit.

While I sympathize for what they went through, I agree and think the verdict was appropriate. This country is so quick to sue at the drop off the hat. I'm glad that it got turned around on them, maybe people may not be so quick to sue now. I doubt it, but maybe.
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
Seems proper indeed.......If this type of arrangement were in place nationwide, we would see far less frivolous law suits!
Exhibit A:



Might be better than the alternative for millions of voters.
I would like a big win the next time I'm in town.
I agree that it is not the theaters fault. this is very interesting.
They should have sued the theater for their gun free zone policy, not the lack of security. Of the 8 theaters showing the premier that night, the Aurora theater was the only one that had a policy of not allowing people with concealed carry licenses to enter the theater while armed.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now