Bill O’Reilly Dragged His Wife Down The Stairs

According to that Gawker report, it was O'Reilly's daughter, not his estranged wife, who told investigators about how her father attacked her mother. The daughter apparently said she saw her father grab her mother by her neck and drag her down some stairs.

According to Gawker, the daughter told investigators of the attack within the past year. The daughter is now 16.

According to the Gawker report, O'Reilly also tried to get his wife's cop boyfriend into trouble at work, and tried to get his wife excommunicatted from the Catholic Church.

The judge eventually gave custody of the children to the mother.

Yow.

Forkie is absolutely correct. Some Clinton Foundation money goes to Chelsea's $10,000,000 home. Some goes to Hillary's election fund. A bunch goes to family travel on private jets. Some goes to whatever Hillary decides to report after sifting through her emails.



Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Hmmm. What the Clinton Foundation claims and what the tax returns show, are two completely separate things. Are you suggesting that the tax returns are wrong, because God forbid that the Clintons would ever lie?


I understand the tax returns are wrong and are being refiled. If someone on these boards stated that fact then their commentary would be accurate.

But the criticism on these boards was something else. People here suggested less than 15% of money donated to the charity was going to the actual charity. That was a smearing lie wasn't it?


That's what the numbers showed, no smearing lie there.
According to your idiot metric, the American Red Cross give less than 15% to charity. Of course the reality is that "grants" are not the only form of charity, for the Red Cross, the Clinton Foundation, or thousands of other organizations, including most religious organizations. More often than not, they administer their own programs. Imagine that.

So now that you've had it explained to you jatki, next time you say it you're just lying.


Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
According to that Gawker report, it was O'Reilly's daughter, not his estranged wife, who told investigators about how her father attacked her mother. The daughter apparently said she saw her father grab her mother by her neck and drag her down some stairs.

According to Gawker, the daughter told investigators of the attack within the past year. The daughter is now 16.

According to the Gawker report, O'Reilly also tried to get his wife's cop boyfriend into trouble at work, and tried to get his wife excommunicatted from the Catholic Church.

The judge eventually gave custody of the children to the mother.

Yow.




Yes, the fact that it was a custody dispute where the wife was trying to get his “joint custody” revoked is very telling. Joint custody is very common nowadays and the Judge would only take that away if he or she felt Bill had exhibited abusive of behavior of some type.
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Forkie is absolutely correct. Some Clinton Foundation money goes to Chelsea's $10,000,000 home. Some goes to Hillary's election fund...
Is that from the same undisclosed source that says the IRS budget has doubled? I'm still waiting for that one! But even a lot of right-wingers don't take your accusations seriously. Here are some donors to the Clinton Foundation:

News Corporation Foundation (Fox News): $500,000+
James Murdoch (Fox News): $1,000,000+
Chris Ruddy (CEO of Newsmax): $1,000,000
Donald Trump: $100,000+

Now Boilerman, don't you feel silly?

According CNN the Red Cross gives about 91%link of course Forkie will deny this....

Charity Navigator lists the Red Cross with a top rating: link

Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
According CNN the Red Cross gives about 91%link of course Forkie will deny this....

Charity Navigator lists the Red Cross with a top rating: link
How about a quote from your link that backs up that claim? If your claim is true, I'm SURE you won't hesitate to do that!

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
According CNN the Red Cross gives about 91%link of course Forkie will deny this....

Charity Navigator lists the Red Cross with a top rating: link
How about a quote from your link that backs up that claim? If your claim is true, I'm SURE you won't hesitate to do that!


You forget how to read?
Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
According CNN the Red Cross gives about 91%link of course Forkie will deny this....

Charity Navigator lists the Red Cross with a top rating: link
How about a quote from your link that backs up that claim? If your claim is true, I'm SURE you won't hesitate to do that!


You forget how to read?
How about a quote from your link that backs up that claim? If your claim is true, I'm SURE you won't hesitate to do that!

Oh wait... You've already hesitated, haven't you?
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
BTW I would trust an org like Charity Navigator over your defense any day PJ. I really wonder why in the world you would defend someone so quickly with nothing whatsoever than calling my links lies? Forky I expect it from, you, not so much. The Clintons are pretty slimy, I'll say the same about the bush library, would you?


If you trust your link then you cant trust yourself. It contradicts your conclusion. Your reputable link says the Red Cross gives 90% of its money to charity. Your method of analyzing their tax records would say its less than 10%.


So who is wrong, jatki? You or your reputable link to charity navigator?


What are talking about, I've never ONCE claimed th red cross gave less than 10%, let alone anything about their tax records, I've never even seen 'em. Show me where I've ever said that or evn made reference to it. This thread is the first thing I've ever mentioned th red cross and that's only because it was first on that list. I will say I trust this site way way more than I do your word, don't even need to mention forky, SHEESH

Man, here's some real pieces of crap..

https://news.yahoo.com/ftc-family-raised-187m-cancer-spent-themselves-161711512--politics.html

FTC: Family raised $187M for cancer, spent it on themselves

"WASHINGTON (AP) — A Tennessee man and his family used much of the $187 million it collected for cancer patients to buy themselves cars, gym memberships and take luxury cruise vacations, pay for college tuition and employ family members with six-figure salaries, federal officials alleged Tuesday in one of the largest charity fraud cases ever, involving all 50 states..."
"...But little money made it to cancer patients, as the groups "operated as personal fiefdoms characterized by rampant nepotism, flagrant conflicts of interest, and excessive insider compensation" with none of the controls used by bona fide charities, the FTC said Tuesday..."

Total slimeballs.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now