Bob Woodward opines the Clinton Foundation is corrupt (POL)

Unbelievable. How naive and stupid can some of our liberal posters be?

Chris Wallace: "Secretary Clinton, during your 2009 Senate confirmation hearing, you promised to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest with your dealing with the Clinton Foundation while you were secretary of state," Wallace said.

He continued: "But emails show that donors got special access to you — those seeking grants for Haiti relief were considered separately from non-donors, and some of those donors got government contracts, taxpayer money. Can you really say that you kept your pledge to that Senate committee?"

Why would these countries who normally don't donate money want to donate all this money, unless it was for access. Why would Clinton who claims to be fighting for women's rights, accept millions from countries who are among the biggest abusers of women? When pressed on this she declined to answer.

Terry McCauliffe a FOC donated $500k to the spouse of the FBI asst director who was investigating clinton's email.

How much did Hillary Clinton profit from money donated to her charity that fights AIDS, provides disaster relief, and educates girls? ZERO....but such donations fall into the category of "pay for play" according to the birthers who are voting for a guy that took personal loans from Russian lenders to fund his personal endeavors.

The only thing funnier is when they complain about HIllary's dishonesty while voting for the birth-certificate guy.

"Yes. It's corrupt. It's a scandal".
Bob Woodward---

Associate editor of the Washington Post
Recipient of nearly every major American journalism award
Responsible for the Washington Post winning 2 Pulitzer Prizes


And Now: Birther and Voting For Trump--- According to PJ.

Bob Woodward is a birther --- now that's a headline!

Voting for a Chicago Democrat one must realize that pay to play comes with the package. In Chicago, pols are like a box a chocolates, you ALWAYS know what you're gonna get.

I have huge respect for Bob Woodward (who, by the way, was called a member of the liberal media by the same people propping him up now when he weighed in on the Bush Administration's lies).

But Neither Woodward nor anyone here can explain what the corruption in this instance is. Hillary Clinton was a civilian in 2015 with no authority to do anything in the US State Department (which is the crux of the charge). So - what.....you are saying Civilian Hillary Clinton accepted money into her Charity in exchange for an audience with a foreign entity...and that's corrupt ? What conflict of interest was she violating other than making your hemorrhoids flare up?

Since you're only answer is "Bob Woodward says so" then you don't even know what you're upset about. Sounds like Bengazhi all over again.

One more time. Woodward didn't make that comment out of the blue. He was responding to a question that included references to "clear evidence that Clinton Foundation donors were being treated differently than non-donors in terms of access". So his answer wasn't just about the 12 million dollar donation from a dictator....it was about the entirety of the foundation and how foundation donors got access to Hillary when she was Secretary of State. Now, I imagine PJ will deny there is any such 'clear evidence'....I'm not sure about that. Why not just ask Hillary? Oh wait a minute...Woodward commented on that too. Regarding Wallace's direct question on the topic in the debate..Woodard commented "And she didn't answer your question at all".

Now as to your comment about some 'propping him up' now, yet attacking him on 'Bush lies'....I thought he was right about Bush and is right about Hillary. And you...(who claims such respect)...now all of a sudden no longer trust his opinion...just like the right wingers you say pick and choose when they believe a source based solely on how it helps their candidate. Kind of reeks.

I wonder what Trump expected in return for providing free coke and underage girls at those parties he held in the 1990s?