Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

Breaking news!! Singer drops his escrow demand!

knagl
knagl
Jun 22, 2011
5:59pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
OK Knagl, you want a confession out of me? You've got it. I'm really Rob Singer.




That's obvious lie number two in this thread. Where's your journalistic integrity?

I really don't care to fight with you, and I know I'll catch flack for quoting a TV judge, but "Don't Pee on My Leg and Tell Me It's Raining." People see through lies, and it's easy for someone to get their credibility damaged beyond repair when it's obvious that they're not telling the truth.
chipchik
chipchik
Jun 22, 2011
6:06pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: knagl
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
I'm sorry so many people have bad feelings about what has been written before by Singer. It really is a shame and it should never have happened. I don't know who started it

I'll give you one guess.


Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
there are about a dozen LVA members who have known for years who I am. And my staff member who created another identity using my real name was told that was wrong to do.

Hold the phone. You're really going to sit here and claim that "your staff member" created an account with your name, AND made this post without your knowledge? I don't buy that for one minute, sir. I'd have a lot more respect for you if you just admited you did it because you wanted to plug your message forum and didn't want to associate "MoneyLA" with your real life identity. That's plausable and somewhat understandable -- the yarn you just created isn't.


I about fell out of my chair when I read that bull about his staff. GMAFB
Does he think his intelligence is so above everyone on this board that we would believe that?
lol
As he said earlier "some of the characters here are the most amazing".
MoneyLA
MoneyLA
Jun 22, 2011
6:15pm
Block User
Once again: both parties should select their judges who will monitor the play and conditions including the number of hands per hour, number of hours, coin in and cash out which are the conditions of the contest.

I suggest that a rule be set up to "stop the clock" when there is a handpay.

We can handle a live web broadcast and I can put highlights on TV should anyone care about seeing those highlights later.

I suggest that the small escrow amount be handled by the judges.

I will not be a judge for either party.

My role will be to set up the live webcast and show the play and the final outcome. If for some reason the casino(s) do not allow cameras I ask that the judge(s) for each side prepare a "report" after each session to be webcast or broadcast.
chipchik
chipchik
Jun 22, 2011
6:20pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: knagl
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
OK Knagl, you want a confession out of me? You've got it. I'm really Rob Singer.




That's obvious lie number two in this thread. Where's your journalistic integrity?

I really don't care to fight with you, and I know I'll catch flack for quoting a TV judge, but "Don't Pee on My Leg and Tell Me It's Raining." People see through lies, and it's easy for someone to get their credibility damaged beyond repair when it's obvious that they're not telling the truth.


Judge Judy is proud to be quoted.


jatki
jatki
Jun 22, 2011
7:22pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: FrankieRizzo
Well if occasionally making special plays and setting win/loss goals when gambling is essentially his system, well then I do that too, and lets just leave it at that.

There shouldn't be any need to call anyone who plays differently an addict, or insult their wives, or threaten their jobs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are absolutely correct

If you kiss his ass, then its ok to kill your, sickly girl friend off slowly, by taking her to the Silverton casino every other month for weeks at a time despite all of her health issues. Health so bad that she didn't even want to come out of the room for the majority of the trip




--Rizzo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont think busting on bagiant does any good at all. I dont know him personally and maybe you do,but to say the guy doesn't care about his lady friend and saying in essence that he's trying to kill her of slowly is just plain wrong. In his reports he certainly shows compassion for her well-being and trying to make her as comfortable as possible.
I too,suffer from neuropathy (nothing even close to the extent she suffers,enough to have to take oxycontin tho) and I certainly don't want to have an affect on our lives,well as little as possible anyway. Life must go on and if shes cool with it,more power to them.

JOHN

arcimedes
arcimedes
Jun 22, 2011
10:42pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
You forgot to mention he threw in an new caveat. So far he has not accepted anything.


What is the new caveat?


Are you just plain stupid or can't you read? He now has stated he can quit at any time instead of having to play the full 30K hands. Remember that the 30K was actually a mis-type and Dan meant 300K. So, Singer is hoping he gets lucky early and can quit and run with the money. He realizes that time is against him. I've explained many times that any progressive system improves the chances of winning an individual session while leading to large losses when it fails. Trying to give himself this out is a simple recognition that the more he plays the greater the chance he will lose.

The real sad thing is I've explained this to you many times. You should already know this and it should have been a red flag. So, the question is ... are you backing Singer in the bet? Are you putting up any money, Money? Be honest for a change.
Jennifer
Jennifer
Jun 22, 2011
10:48pm
Block User
this thread....wow.

so many things to comment on.

first of all, having a successful business is not an indicator of intelligence. second, the whole "anyone being mean is just jealous" is something a parent tells a six year old to make him feel better.

or maybe you are right and i am just jealous that i dont have to sit around on lva asking the same questions over and over and over and never understanding the most simplest responses.

the whole "my staff member posted that"......ugh. anyone who believes that probably also believes that the only reason anyone gets on this idiots case is because they are jealous of him.

seriously.
arcimedes
arcimedes
Jun 22, 2011
11:00pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Frankie, I dont blame you for your hostility towards anyone who tries to interfere with your job. That should be strictly off limits here. I have also criticized Rob for what he said about Arc's wife and there is no justification for that. But there is nothing wrong with presenting ideas about gaming that are new, different and yes -- controversial.

First of all, they are NOT "new and different". As pointed out already progressive systems have been known for centuries. Just because you're uninformed does not make Singer's nonsense any better. You are pushing a scam which reflects 100% on YOUR character.

Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Thank you for saying, Frankie, that "on occasion I do take risks with special plays, and I set win/loss goals" because that actually sums up Singer's strategy.

No, win/loss goals have also been around as long as there has been gambling. Giving Singer credit for this just shows how easily you are fooled. Suck it up, Money, and admit you have been conned and fell for this nonsense without doing the proper research.

Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
I have posted that I don't "follow" Singer, but I see value in a few of his "special plays." And I see a lot of value in his betting strategy and money management. And to be honest, it's brilliant. The casinos want you to grind away; the casinos don't want you to play like Singer does because Singer has a good shot to walk away with money in his pocket. The grinders will grind, Singer wants to hit and run.

More nonsense. This has all been explained in detail, yet here you are claiming BS is "brilliant". In many ways this is absolutely hilarious in the way the British love sarcasm. Too bad you're a complete sucker instead of a witty comedian.
Janis Meyer
Janis Meyer
Jun 22, 2011
11:30pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedesWhat is the new caveat?


Are you just plain stupid or can't you read? He now has stated he can quit at any time instead of having to play the full 30K hands. Remember that the 30K was actually a mis-type and Dan meant 300K. So, Singer is hoping he gets lucky early and can quit and run with the money. He realizes that time is against him. I've explained many times that any progressive system improves the chances of winning an individual session while leading to large losses when it fails. Trying to give himself this out is a simple recognition that the more he plays the greater the chance he will lose.

The real sad thing is I've explained this to you many times. You should already know this and it should have been a red flag. So, the question is ... are you backing Singer in the bet? Are you putting up any money, Money? Be honest for a change.


I was wondering when someone was going to catch that. Good one Arc.

Without this caveat though, I do think omalley is being awful quiet. Did he bite off more than he coud chew. If you read his original post on this subject he did a lot of spouting off. How much did he think he was going to win or lose? I don't think 75k is an unreasonable escrow. As far as number of hands go omalley was so confident he seemed like he didn't really care how many hands were played. It was money in the bank for him. I say put up or shut up.

arcimedes
arcimedes
Jun 23, 2011
12:06am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: thlf
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes What is the new caveat?


Are you just plain stupid or can't you read? He now has stated he can quit at any time instead of having to play the full 30K hands. Remember that the 30K was actually a mis-type and Dan meant 300K. So, Singer is hoping he gets lucky early and can quit and run with the money. He realizes that time is against him. I've explained many times that any progressive system improves the chances of winning an individual session while leading to large losses when it fails. Trying to give himself this out is a simple recognition that the more he plays the greater the chance he will lose.

The real sad thing is I've explained this to you many times. You should already know this and it should have been a red flag. So, the question is ... are you backing Singer in the bet? Are you putting up any money, Money? Be honest for a change.


I was wondering when someone was going to catch that. Good one Arc.


Not too difficult. Singer was doing his normal thing and all of a sudden he's willing to drop the escrow. In addition, you have AlMoney you has lost face in his support of Singer. So, they work out a plan where Singer doesn't have to risk anything and AlMoney hopes to regain his credibility (as if that could happen). The caveat to limit the number of hands works into the plan as well because it plays into the short term nature of the scam where they would have a better chance of winning.



Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now