Breaking news!! Singer drops his escrow demand!

Arc I have no financial standing in this. Singer sent me an email about the challenge that was made on this forum. I put Singers comments to me on my Forum. If this challenge happens I have offered to webcast it.

Money, I have no dog in this fight, but I do have one thing to say to you if you are the person that is being implied you are on this thread.

You should not carry any gambling system on your site, period. To carry it on your site implies that you endorse and recommend it, even if you don't. There are people who put faith in your recommended stores and places that you have reported on in the past, and therefore might trust you on a gambling system.

Your biggest nightmare is someone claims they bought a gambling system based upon you publicizing it on your site, and that person then proceeds to lose a considerable amount of money, not excluding their rent, mortgage, or child support money.

You do not want that kind of negative publicity to occur or even the chance of it occurring.

Then take your own advice and stay out of it.

Word.


An example from https://www.alanbestbuys.com/id194.html :

"4c 6c 8c 9c Ad: OH=4689 @ $4.79; SP=A @ $2.43* *There must be at least one high card in a 4 card flush to hold it over an Ace."

Idiotic. No disclaimers will solve the problems that might arise from this adventure.

Fair enough. From now on I have nothing more to say about the challenge.

Roulette man, no where do I endorse any gambling system. But I do present ideas not only on gambling (pro and con) but also on finances, stocks, gold, investing, consumer news, how to buy furniture and appliances, info on how to find better values when shopping, etc. I do offer my own opinions and I stand by my opinions on gambling. You should also read my aricles about playing "correct strategy" on video poker and how I am critical of players who don't follow correct strategy.

You will not see any endorsement of Singer's system anywhere. In fact, I challenge his comments about machines not being random and even present info to dispute it.

In the special plays video and text it is clearly spelled out that each and every special play is at a disadvantage to the "regular play" and the
"math" of the game. This is what makes Singer's system of interest-- because in some cases he disregards the math to go for a big win. It is a unique strategy and as I say several times in my site, it is a controversial strategy. Newscasts and news reporters are not supposed to pass judgment on controversial ideas -- news people are supposed to present ideas for discussion. That is what I did.

If I thought Singer's system had no value, I probably wouldnt have spent much time or space on it. But his system does have value. You may not like the man, but the system has some value:

1. He follows the traditional math 95% of the time
2. He has a win goal that he follows (a very important lesson for everyone)
3. He sets a loss limit (a very important lesson for everyone)
4. He has a unique method of using his bankroll to move up in denominations to attain a win which wipes out previous losses and to hit his win goal -- and this is what got my attention.

Now, in all fairness, if Dancer or Grochowski or anyone else who is a recognized VP expert would want to let me video tape their strategies and put them on my website for all to see without paying a fee (my site is open to all with no fee) I would be very happy to do that. I would be not only happy to meet Dancer in Vegas and video tape his strategy plays, but I would be honored to have the opportunity.

I want my five dollars.

mrmarcus, what you cited above is the text to explain Singer's video description of the hand:

"An example from https://www.alanbestbuys.com/id194.html :

"4c 6c 8c 9c Ad: OH=4689 @ $4.79; SP=A @ $2.43* *There must be at least one high card in a 4 card flush to hold it over an Ace."

Idiotic. No disclaimers will solve the problems that might arise from this adventure."

This is Singer's strategy. Please also note that Singer states that the "optimal hold" (which can be called proper strategy) is worth more up front than his special play. In fact, Singer admits that his special play is worth only about half of what the "optimal hold" is worth. This is Singer's system. The videos explain the system. You make your own judgment.

edited to add:

jenaphir, I invite you to read EVERYTHING that I wrote in my report about Singer's system, including my criticism of it -- as well as what might be valuable ideas. Also be sure you read everything else about video poker that I wrote. you can start here: https://alanbestbuys.com/id132.html

How many "gamblers" are going to take advice from someone trying to make money off you?