"A judge dealt Caesars Entertainment Corp. (CZR)’s bankruptcy reorganization a possible fatal blow in ruling that the company violated federal law when it shuffled assets and refinanced debt as part of an alleged scheme to protect itself from lower-ranking creditors.
The August transactions underpin the proposed bankruptcy reorganization laid out in agreements in which first-lien noteholders would receive a 92 percent recovery while junior noteholders could take home no more than $549 million for their $5.24 billion in second-lien notes."
Ref: Bloomberg, 19 Jan 2015
Basically, last August Caesars split itself into two entities, . . . effectively a "good" Caesars holding valuable corporate assets and a "bad" Caesars loaded with, f'rinstance, unpayable debt.
The result would've "cost" the senior lenders only 8% of their investment, while giving the junior lenders a 99.9% haircut. The judge has suggested this might not be entirely fair.
The August transactions underpin the proposed bankruptcy reorganization laid out in agreements in which first-lien noteholders would receive a 92 percent recovery while junior noteholders could take home no more than $549 million for their $5.24 billion in second-lien notes."
Ref: Bloomberg, 19 Jan 2015
Basically, last August Caesars split itself into two entities, . . . effectively a "good" Caesars holding valuable corporate assets and a "bad" Caesars loaded with, f'rinstance, unpayable debt.
The result would've "cost" the senior lenders only 8% of their investment, while giving the junior lenders a 99.9% haircut. The judge has suggested this might not be entirely fair.