Hoops sounds like one of them class-warfare, success-hatin' liberal types.
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteAccording to DonDiego's typically dishonest metric:
Originally posted by: DonDiego
DonDiego opines the 15% figure is as originally described.
Of all the funds which departed the Clinton Foundation from 2009 through 2103
__85% was expenses
__15% was "charitable" grants...
Of all the funds which departed the American Red Cross for the year ending 6/2013
__92% was expenses
__8% was "charitable" grants
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
Is that the best you can come up with about President Bush - a 3 year old story?
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
Is that the best you can come up with about President Bush - a 3 year old story?
QuoteAnd I see you changed the title of the thread accordingly. Good for you.
Originally posted by: jphelanQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteAccording to DonDiego's typically dishonest metric:
Originally posted by: DonDiego
DonDiego opines the 15% figure is as originally described.
Of all the funds which departed the Clinton Foundation from 2009 through 2103
__85% was expenses
__15% was "charitable" grants...
Of all the funds which departed the American Red Cross for the year ending 6/2013
__92% was expenses
__8% was "charitable" grants
I believe the original source is correct - that 15% of revenue to the Clinton foundation were distributed as charitable grants. However this is misleading as all "charitable" works of the Clinton foundation are completed within the charitable grants and this is not out of line with other charities (i.e. the American Red Cross)...