Clinton Foundation / Clinton Wealth questions linger (POL)

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan


I also saw an "older" and dormant users named FORKUSH, FORKUSHII, and FORKUSHIII. Could it be these users were banished from this "island" for bad behavior and Forky had to change his username to return?...
Nope. As DonDiego, alanleroy, and others have attested to, when some of us have re-upped our paid membership, our user names stopped working on the FFA, and one way to fix that was to register under a different user name. And speaking of making accusations ending in question marks:

Is your mother a whore?...I'm not saying she's a whore. I'm just wondering out loud if she is a whore. All I'm saying is that reasonable people who have banged your mother for money can disagree.

That was Jon Stewart making fun of disreputable people who make accusations they can't support by asking questions. Sorry I didn't make that clearer with quotation marks - sometimes I just type too fast.


Bullshit, Dale banned you so many times, it's laughable you try to say otherwise...
So many times? Really? PJ, DonDiego, snidely, alanleroy - do you guys have any recollection of that?

jatki, once again you demonstrate your troubled relationship with the truth. Maybe we should just call it...inflation!


HA! Maybe my memory might be slipping, but I know you went through like 4-5 aliases in a span of a year or two, I wasn't aware subscriptions ran out that quick.But whatever, I'm not gonna argue about it, go ahead and live in your little world of denial arshie, er forkie.

More clinton double talk

Hillary Clinton, just three weeks after blasting "unaccountable money" and calling for a campaign finance overhaul, reportedly met with potential donors to a super PAC backing her White House campaign Wednesday -- the first such face-to-face meetings held by a Democratic presidential candidate.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Clinton met with a small group of potential donors to Priorities USA Action Wednesday in San Francisco. Campaign officials told the paper that she will take part in more such meetings, including one planned to take place in Los Angeles on Thursday
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
More clinton double talk

Hillary Clinton, just three weeks after blasting "unaccountable money" and calling for a campaign finance overhaul, reportedly met with potential donors to a super PAC backing her White House campaign Wednesday -- the first such face-to-face meetings held by a Democratic presidential candidate.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Clinton met with a small group of potential donors to Priorities USA Action Wednesday in San Francisco. Campaign officials told the paper that she will take part in more such meetings, including one planned to take place in Los Angeles on Thursday
Wait! A presidential candidate is actually soliciting donations from donors? I bet that's never happened before.

Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
More clinton double talk

Hillary Clinton, just three weeks after blasting "unaccountable money" and calling for a campaign finance overhaul, reportedly met with potential donors to a super PAC backing her White House campaign Wednesday -- the first such face-to-face meetings held by a Democratic presidential candidate.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Clinton met with a small group of potential donors to Priorities USA Action Wednesday in San Francisco. Campaign officials told the paper that she will take part in more such meetings, including one planned to take place in Los Angeles on Thursday


And Jeb is working for his SUper-PAC. That will be illegal once he makes his candidacy official. So, he'll quit the day before. At that point his PAC and his candidacy have to be 100% independent of Rock solid independence, aint it?

Ain't Citizen's United great? I suport people who advocate getting rid of it. Hoops doesn't...even while he complains about special interest money


pj/forky miss the point. A few weeks ago she makes a speech about special interest money and then she is out hustling for money from the same groups she railed against.

Typical clinton; do as I say not as I do
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
pj/forky miss the point. A few weeks ago she makes a speech about special interest money and then she is out hustling for money from the same groups she railed against.

Typical clinton; do as I say not as I do
So you're saying that any candidate that supports campaign finance reform should commit political suicide by refusing campaign donations, right?

Yep, I thought that's what you were saying.
"She called for getting "unaccountable money out of [politics] once and for all -- even if it takes a constitutional amendment." The remark was widely seen as a reference to the 2010 Supreme Court cases that opened the door for super PACs. "

she said she want is out, so if she is serious about the issue, then don;t take the money, but like a typical clinton wave money in their face they grab it with both hands
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"She called for getting "unaccountable money out of [politics] once and for all -- even if it takes a constitutional amendment." The remark was widely seen as a reference to the 2010 Supreme Court cases that opened the door for super PACs. "

she said she want is out, so if she is serious about the issue, then don;t take the money...and then she is guaranteed to lose the election. My plan, it's genius!!!
Fixed.
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
pj/forky miss the point. A few weeks ago she makes a speech about special interest money and then she is out hustling for money from the same groups she railed against.

Typical clinton; do as I say not as I do


I got the point, forky and PJ are great at glossing over any point unless it benefits their person/argument or whatever it may be.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"She called for getting "unaccountable money out of [politics] once and for all -- even if it takes a constitutional amendment." The remark was widely seen as a reference to the 2010 Supreme Court cases that opened the door for super PACs. "

she said she want is out, so if she is serious about the issue, then don;t take the money...and then she is guaranteed to lose the election. My plan, it's genius!!!
Fixed.


Changing others post is so disingenuous, welcome to the ranks of marcisdave forkie. You've earned it

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now