Vegas Free-for-All - Clinton Foundation / Clinton Wealth questions linger (POL)

Clinton Foundation / Clinton Wealth questions linger (POL)

hoops2

May 14, 2015
1:38am

When in doubt blame President Bush

clinton chose to declare her presidency now; so since she is now a candidate she should be available to answer questions

forkushV

May 14, 2015
2:18am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
When in doubt blame President Bush

clinton chose to declare her presidency now; so since she is now a candidate she should be available to answer questions

Maybe it's a strategy move to aid her in her nefarious plot - psst, don't tell anyone - to win the presidential election! I understand she hatched it right after murdering Vince Foster, plundering Whitewater, planning Benghazi, etc.

And I'm no expert, but maybe it's working:

hoops2

May 14, 2015
3:47am

Block User

"Maybe it's a strategy move"

by her handlers to say as little as possible - such as how poor she and bill were upon leaving the white house

Boilerman

May 14, 2015
5:44am

Block User

Here you go PJ. Also, while you're at it, please post where I claim that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii.

https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2014/Q3/purdue-expert-showed-ebola-can-enter-cells-that-line-the-trachea-and-lungs-says-airborne-transmission-is-not-an-impossibility.html

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
PJ, please tell me what in this Dr Sanders bio that leads you to believe that he's a crackpot. As Sanders is one of the World's most Ebola knowledgeable scientists, he's in a good position to discuss a mutation to airborne transmission.

He's not a crackpot. You misquoted him and his position and claimed that Ebola was airborne on these boards. I hope he doesn't read these boards...he might sue you for libel.

Boilerman's Airborne Ebola thread

Boilerman

May 14, 2015
5:46am

Block User

Dodging again?

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
A NPR report is showing that shrillery has answered 13 questions from the presss since announcing her candidacy; none since april April 20th. Half of the questions are versions of how do you like Iowa.

Why is she hiding?

W did the same thing leading up to the 2000 election....and you were so upset about it that you voted for him twice.

We are only 5 months after the midterm winners took office. I'd be thrilled if none of the 2016 candidates said anything until next Janaury.

pjstroh

May 14, 2015
6:36am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Dodging again?

I made my position clear.. and my position is consistent (as usual). Hoops' and your position is hypocritical (as usual). And I'll never tire of pointing that out.

pjstroh

May 14, 2015
6:40am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Here you go PJ. Also, while you're at it, please post where I claim that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii.

https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2014/Q3/purdue-expert-showed-ebola-can-enter-cells-that-line-the-trachea-and-lungs-says-airborne-transmission-is-not-an-impossibility.html

And your link recounts the argument we already had. Your scientist says viruses have the ability to mutate over time. You misquoted him and claimed he said Ebola was airborne. That was a lie. You peddled misinformation before....and you just double-downed on it now. Congratulations.

chefantwon

May 14, 2015
9:47am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote
Originally posted by: chefantwon
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
He gave his money to his lawyer to manage, who do you think should manage it? Who is managing the Clinton fortune?

Maybe Charles Schwab? Or any independant firm that does not have a client-privileged confidentiality agreement. Mitt's blind trust was blind....because he says so. he promised his lawyer wasn't giving him any information about his financial accounts and we can verify that by .....taking Mitt's word for it. Lucky Mitt had lots of voters like Hoops that are willing to take his word for things.

Crazy. You mean you blindly accept whatever Hillary says as the truth with everything's shes's been questioned about but you question if Mitt and his lawyers relationship is as they say. You do know his attorney could get disbarred if found not to be true. Far, far, WAY FURTHER less than if some of the things Hillary has said were found not to be true. SHEESH

John, she's a Clinton meaning words never matter. They can never be caught even IF you have a video of them doing something illegal it would never stick because of what the meaning of the word is, is.

What the meaning of the word is, is? Are you trying to tar the wife for the sins of the husband?

I don't know about that. It would be like saying that because Jeb Bush has proven himself to be a complete moron lately, it means that George W. Bush must be stupid too.

That would be VERY unfair to George W.

I don't know, its the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" some woman was talking about as her hubby was debating whether to suck on some young womans boobs, or to leave some biological fluids on said young woman. Which was NOT his wife.

Maybe its the same woman that had a private email server sending OFFICIAL government emails, which when asked, denied its existance. Once she admitted she used it for "some" emails she promptly had the hard drives erased and then claimed the emails were "lost".

When it comes to Clinton's, they are both sinners....

hoops2

May 19, 2015
11:31pm

Block User

Another bad day for shrillery

"The New York Times reported that Clinton, as secretary of state, used her private email to share private intelligence reports from Sidney Blumenthal, at a time when Blumenthal was being paid by the Clinton Foundation and liberal political organizations that helped lay the groundwork for Clinton’s presidential campaign.

The emails included reports on Libya at a time when Blumenthal was seeking business in the country and included dubious information. The Times reported that Clinton nonetheless “took Mr. Blumenthal’s advice seriously” and “continued to pass around his emails even after other senior diplomats concluded that Mr. Blumenthal’s assessments were often unreliable.”

hoops2

May 21, 2015
12:42am

Block User

A longtime Clinton confidant reportedly advised then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton two days after the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that an Al Qaeda-tied group had planned the deadly assault and used a protest as cover -- but despite this warning, Clinton's U.N. ambassador went on to publicly claim the attack was simply "spontaneous."

The guidance from ex-Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal was contained in a memo sent Sept. 13, according to The New York Times. It is the latest documentation effectively contradicting the administration's early narrative that the attack was driven by protests over an anti-Islam Internet video -- and raising questions over why officials stuck to that story for days.

According to the Times, Blumenthal initially blamed "demonstrators" angry over that video for the attacks. But the next day, he sent Clinton a very different memo.

According to the Times, Blumenthal told Clinton the attack was driven by Al Qaeda-tied Ansar al-Shariah members who had planned it for a month and used a protest as cover. He cited "sensitive sources."

"We should get this around asap," Clinton reportedly told an adviser in response.

Yet, despite this guidance, then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice would go on several television programs Sept. 16 to claim the attacks were "spontaneous," and not premeditated, and link them to protests over the anti-Islam video

«‹22 ›»

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now