Clinton Foundation / Clinton Wealth questions linger (POL)

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99


WTF..really? are you talking about!? I know post enquirer pages is a favorite thing of yours, I've never known why, they have zero relevance to anything. The topic is the Clinton Found. and how some think it's not much more than a slush fund for the Clintons and their ilk, forkie changes topics and then you post some Gordon ramsey something or other. Seriously? WTF are you thinking or what is your thought process on that. It has no correlation to anything(they usually don't).


My deepest apologies. I thought this thread was an intelligent discussion about factually reported events from credible news sources. I found one making a claim with the same level of reporting integrity as the one Hoops' used. Sorry if that got you upset but we have serious issues to sort out here.

Now, can we please get back to our fact-based discussion regarding Bigfoot alleged ties to Al Queada?

I'm going to start counting the number of voters who could possibly change their mind about next year's general election based on this report from the Washington Times that the Clinton Foundation raised funds charity funds in Sweden for causes like fighting climate change, AIDS in Africa and cholera in Haiti at the same time the State Department was deciding not to blacklist certain Swedish firms for having business with Iran.

Okay, here we go.











































And scene.












Quote

Originally posted by: JM2300
















Love the pics JM, but why? I used to build a lot of models when I was a kid, I believe I built one of almost all those, I love all the WWII fighters and bombers. My model of the B-52's never turned out right tho, couldn't get the bouffant's painted right.
I think the British Spitfire was the coolest fighter of the war. Sorry, way OT(but so were you )

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99


WTF..really? are you talking about!? I know post enquirer pages is a favorite thing of yours, I've never known why, they have zero relevance to anything. The topic is the Clinton Found. and how some think it's not much more than a slush fund for the Clintons and their ilk, forkie changes topics and then you post some Gordon ramsey something or other. Seriously? WTF are you thinking or what is your thought process on that. It has no correlation to anything(they usually don't).


My deepest apologies. I thought this thread was an intelligent discussion about factually reported events from credible news sources. I found one making a claim with the same level of reporting integrity as the one Hoops' used. Sorry if that got you upset but we have serious issues to sort out here.

Now, can we please get back to our fact-based discussion regarding Bigfoot alleged ties to Al Queada?


Upset? Hardly. I don't get upset over the internets(haha). I just found it kinda ridiculous that you posted something like that, if you want to challenge a mans post, there's a much better way, but you know that. Sorry, to sign off with a bigfoot reference, is equally..well, you know, I don't want to say it.

I find it really hard to believe that just about every living soul doesn't find some of the CF dealings a little fishy. Hell PJ, you were questioning Mitt's blind trust agreement with his BFF/attorney (or whoever) over if it was really "BLIND", SHEESH. (I actually would venture to say that the super wealthy who have "blind trusts" have a say in what's going on, but ,whatever). Do you really think it's just a coincidence that some Russian guy got State dept approval to buy a uranium mine that gave a 20% share of the US output? C'mon..

If it were any sitting conservative, you and forkie would be roasting 'em alive, well forkie anyway. I wonder what would happen if some VP made a few bucks from some association with an oil rig co.? I believe there were all kinds of accusations flying around. It smelled, and I agreed, but it all "seemed" legal. Well,I can call a spade a spade, can you?

Hillary destroyed evidence, and now PJ claims that there is no evidence. He's a genious!


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99


WTF..really? are you talking about!? I know post enquirer pages is a favorite thing of yours, I've never known why, they have zero relevance to anything. The topic is the Clinton Found. and how some think it's not much more than a slush fund for the Clintons and their ilk, forkie changes topics and then you post some Gordon ramsey something or other. Seriously? WTF are you thinking or what is your thought process on that. It has no correlation to anything(they usually don't).


My deepest apologies. I thought this thread was an intelligent discussion about factually reported events from credible news sources. I found one making a claim with the same level of reporting integrity as the one Hoops' used. Sorry if that got you upset but we have serious issues to sort out here.

Now, can we please get back to our fact-based discussion regarding Bigfoot alleged ties to Al Queada?


Forky - don't lie & say you didn't support clinton in 08. you were a rabid Clinton supporter in 08, until Obama took the lead, at that point you switched sides.

You claim the story I posted is a lie, but the Clinton gang isn't denying it. Yesterday they gave one of their typical non answers on it.

chilly claims the scandal isn't changing any votes, but her numbers keep dropping.
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Forky - don't lie & say you didn't support clinton in 08. you were a rabid Clinton supporter in 08, until Obama took the lead, at that point you switched sides...
Does anyone else here remember that? I'm just curious.

Sheesh, I even held my nose in 2004 to vote for John Kerry because of his vote to authorize the idiot to go to war in Iraq. I'm embarrassed to say that I would have supported John Edwards over Hillary in 2008, because at least he apologized for his vote. So in 2008, Hillary didn't even make my top two. (But she was miles ahead of Kucinich and Sharpton!)

But don't worry, hoops, I will most likely be supporting Hillary in 2016. And if she keeps on doing her Elizabeth Warren imitation, my support may even become rabid.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Forky - don't lie & say you didn't support clinton in 08. you were a rabid Clinton supporter in 08, until Obama took the lead, at that point you switched sides...
Does anyone else here remember that? I'm just curious.



I very specifically remember forkush's support for Obama over Hillary throughout the entire campaign.

I also recall Hoop's support for shutting down the US Auto and Banking industries during that period. And laying off an additional 20% of the public sector. Thats why I laugh every time Hoops complains about unemployment in this country

I also recall Hoop's support for shutting down the US Auto and Banking industries during that period. - NEVER said that, even though pj likes to pretend that I did. I among others advocated that these companies go thru the normal bankruptcy process, rather than having the govt decide which companies get what

And laying off an additional 20% of the public sector - You don't think we have excess staffing at the public level? Having people doing busy work or surfing porn is merely high paid welfare &a wasteof money
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now