Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

Clinton Foundation / Clinton Wealth questions linger (POL)

BrookTaylor
BrookTaylor
Apr 23, 2015
5:55pm
Block User
Yes Jatki, you should laugh since that nonsense spewed by an obvious lunatic can't be taken seriously. I laugh at his posts just like I laugh at a good Chris Matthews rant when it pops up on my Facebook news feed. Marcusdave is probably as mentally unhinged as CM. People should rile him up on purpose just for the humor at his expense.

Forkush is also amusing but he seems to be quite calm and even-keeled. The homemade graphs are especially delightful.

BrookTaylor
BrookTaylor
Apr 23, 2015
6:14pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: BrookTaylor
Yes Jatki, you should laugh since that nonsense spewed by an obvious lunatic can't be taken seriously. I laugh at his posts just like I laugh at a good Chris Matthews rant when it pops up on my Facebook news feed. Marcusdave is probably as mentally unhinged as CM. People should rile him up on purpose just for the humor at his expense. Anyone that makes such angry, hateful posts and claims "hate" by others is either 1) a lunatic, or 2) an unoriginal liberal who can only follow the standard playbook regarding conservatives with little to zero critical thinking skills. By the way 'Faux News" is very original and creative. You deserve to pat yourself on the back for that one. Keep up the good work and I truly appreciate you.

Forkush is also amusing but he seems to be quite calm and even-keeled. The homemade graphs are especially delightful.



pjstroh
pjstroh
Apr 23, 2015
9:48pm
Block User
When liberals made up lies about George Bush I had no problem confronting them and informing them they are embarrassing the rest of us by making up BS. i recall an argument with someone on this board who stated W blew up the levies in New Orleans during Katrina.

Conservatives on this board dont seem to mind propogating BS...like the premise of this thread. they aren't embarrassed jphelan makes up a BS statistic about the CGI's administration. They even double down on it.

This is why i make a conscious effort to avoid starting political threads on this forum. I dont expect much intelligent debate from people who either (a) cant source their posts, or (b) rest their case on a conspiracy theory blog site. There used to be a guy on here, Mindbender, who i argued with quite a bit. But at least he had the integrity to back up his statements with sources and admit when he made a mistake. Now we just get threads like this
MIKEY7777
MIKEY7777
Apr 23, 2015
10:46pm
Block User
Sorry Liberals, she claimed she was broke, that says it all about who she is. WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE. What a joke she is, but the libs love her.

forkushV
forkushV
Apr 23, 2015
11:46pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
The greedy bitch compromised national security while SOS to enrich her "charity" by millions of dollars. She is a criminal at the highest level, but since she is a Democrat, people like you will dismiss facts as partisan attacks. She really should be prosecuted for the real crimes she has committed, but that won't happen with an equally corrupt DOJ.

I guess the New York Times is also a right-wing propaganda machine
Bob, the folks who actually click on YOUR link will learn that you just lied:

"Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown."

And you made hysterical charges of criminal behavior based on that?
jphelan
jphelan
Apr 24, 2015
1:01am
Block User
So, I see three sources here:

1) The Federalist website which I provided
2) The Clinton Foundation which PJ Provided
3) The Tax returned which Roulette Man provided

#1 and #3 agree that only a small amount of Clinton Foundation revenue went to Grants:
#1 said 15%
#3 said 6% while ~20% went to salaries

In the meantime, no one has explained why anyone would donate to this "charity" and / or paying upwards of $500,000 per speech for Bill and / or Hillary. I suggest people are buying influence at the very least and more likely bribing.

Can anyone explain how the Clinton's wealth now approaches that of the Romney family? Can anyone explain how their 35 year old daughter can afford a $10.5m home when her "work" outside the foundation is minimal? I did not realize public servants and foundations added that much to personal net worth.

If people like thumper took the time to think rather than hate, they might someday see through the fog.
hoops2
hoops2
Apr 24, 2015
1:25am
Block User
They say follow the money

1a- bubba gets $500,000 for a speech in Russia
1b - Same company donates to the clinton charities
1c - Company is approved by the State Dept to get 20% control of the country's uranium

2A - bubba gets free flighs on a private jet to Columbia
2B - bubba gets $300,000 for a speech in Columbia
2C - Same company donates to the clinton charities
2D - same company gets approval from state for a trade deal. when shrillery otiginally opposed it

3 - clinton charities are now restating 5 years of tax returns

4-Now we know why like a good mafia don bubba doesn't send emails or leave any trails. Now we know why shrillery deleted 30,000 emails on her private server

Senator Menendez has been indicted on less evidence than this
forkushV
forkushV
Apr 24, 2015
1:31am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: jphelan

In the meantime, no one has explained why anyone would donate to this "charity" and / or paying upwards of $500,000 per speech for Bill and / or Hillary. I suggest people are buying influence at the very least and more likely bribing...
Wait! Are you saying that a politician is getting huge speaking fees from an interest group trying to buy influence. OMG, I've never heard of such thing happening! In human history!
pjstroh
pjstroh
Apr 24, 2015
1:34am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: jphelan
So, I see three sources here:

1) The Federalist website which I provided
2) The Clinton Foundation which PJ Provided
3) The Tax returned which Roulette Man provided

#1 and #3 agree that only a small amount of Clinton Foundation revenue went to Grants:
#1 said 15%
#3 said 6% while ~20% went to salaries

In the meantime, no one has explained why anyone would donate to this "charity" and / or paying upwards of $500,000 per speech for Bill and / or Hillary. I suggest people are buying influence at the very least and more likely bribing.

Can anyone explain how the Clinton's wealth now approaches that of the Romney family? Can anyone explain how their 35 year old daughter can afford a $10.5m home when her "work" outside the foundation is minimal? I did not realize public servants and foundations added that much to personal net worth.

If people like thumper took the time to think rather than hate, they might someday see through the fog.


#1 and #3 do not back up the utter BS premise of your initial statement where you falsely stated only 15% of donations go to the actual cause of the charity.

Someone with integrity would fess up to that error. Someone without integrity would double down on it. Whats your choice, Jphelan?


hoops2
hoops2
Apr 24, 2015
1:37am
Block User
"Can anyone explain how their 35 year old daughter can afford a $10.5m home"

she was making $600k at NBC interviewing the Geico gecko
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now