Clinton Foundation / Clinton Wealth questions linger (POL)

The original question: Why would anyone donate to a foundation with 15% going to charity and 85% to administrative costs.

"Anyone" ranges from me to the filthy rich.

The "me" people donate based on emotion.
- The medical societies, e.g. Alzheimer's, cancer if sister died of cancer, etc.
- Animal welfare groups; more rarely women's shelters.
- Or whomever was listed in an obituary, which is usually the deceased's church, animal shelter, medical society (cancer, Alzheimer's, etc.

The "me" people may or may not have knowledge about an agency or foundation's breakdown. It is out there, but, you have to look for it. Still, if a deceased friend designated a charity, most people will donate in that direction.

The "filthy rich" must and will donate to the foundation that does them the most good, administrative costs be damned. That can be complex, involving their own political ambitions, business interests, etc.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
So, I see three sources here:

1) The Federalist website which I provided
2) The Clinton Foundation which PJ Provided
3) The Tax returned which Roulette Man provided

#1 and #3 agree that only a small amount of Clinton Foundation revenue went to Grants:
#1 said 15%
#3 said 6% while ~20% went to salaries

In the meantime, no one has explained why anyone would donate to this "charity" and / or paying upwards of $500,000 per speech for Bill and / or Hillary. I suggest people are buying influence at the very least and more likely bribing.

Can anyone explain how the Clinton's wealth now approaches that of the Romney family? Can anyone explain how their 35 year old daughter can afford a $10.5m home when her "work" outside the foundation is minimal? I did not realize public servants and foundations added that much to personal net worth.

If people like thumper took the time to think rather than hate, they might someday see through the fog.


#1 and #3 do not back up the utter BS premise of your initial statement where you falsely stated only 15% of donations go to the actual cause of the charity.

Someone with integrity would fess up to that error. Someone without integrity would double down on it. Whats your choice, Jphelan?

Are you claiming the 2013 tax return posted by the IRS on Guidestar was wrong?
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Can anyone explain how their 35 year old daughter can afford a $10.5m home"

she was making $600k at NBC interviewing the Geico gecko
Um, the same reason that Luke Russert is employed, the same reason that Caroline Kennedy was almost appointed a US Senator, and the same reason the W and Jeb AND Hillary were ever considered for high office.

See if you can figure out the rest on your own, jphelan.

Has anyone ever visited the modest retirement home of Eisenhower in Gettysburg, PA? Very modest and quaint.

Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Can anyone explain how their 35 year old daughter can afford a $10.5m home"

she was making $600k at NBC interviewing the Geico gecko


Turning tricks?

She did marry well.

Seriously, "affording" a home is different someone like her than for you and I.
The equation is not the same.
She will never have to break a sweat getting a mortgage just because of who she is.

Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
So, I heard some others bitching about this Mark Levin guy so I decided to give a listen to one of his pod cast' to see just who he was.....

WOW, what a loud obnoxious ass. Well, that's my opinion anyway. The really funny thing is, as I was listening I thought, "this must be what marcisdave sounds like".
Hey, this could be a fun exercise, as long as the two-year olds here don't ruin it.

I see BobOrme as Senator Joseph McCarthy (I don't think Bob would be insulted), Boilerman as Bill O'Reilly (ditto), Roulette Man as General Jack D. Ripper from Dr. Strangelove, and DonDiego as Dr. Strangelove himself.

And of course CowboyKell is Joe Isuzu.
I didn't know she was in a 10.5 million dollar house. It is time to start checking to see if the parents filed gift tax returns. I hope Chelsea and her hubbie can afford the property taxes.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
So, I see three sources here:

1) The Federalist website which I provided
2) The Clinton Foundation which PJ Provided
3) The Tax returned which Roulette Man provided

#1 and #3 agree that only a small amount of Clinton Foundation revenue went to Grants:
#1 said 15%
#3 said 6% while ~20% went to salaries

In the meantime, no one has explained why anyone would donate to this "charity" and / or paying upwards of $500,000 per speech for Bill and / or Hillary. I suggest people are buying influence at the very least and more likely bribing.

Can anyone explain how the Clinton's wealth now approaches that of the Romney family? Can anyone explain how their 35 year old daughter can afford a $10.5m home when her "work" outside the foundation is minimal? I did not realize public servants and foundations added that much to personal net worth.

If people like thumper took the time to think rather than hate, they might someday see through the fog.


#1 and #3 do not back up the utter BS premise of your initial statement where you falsely stated only 15% of donations go to the actual cause of the charity.

Someone with integrity would fess up to that error. Someone without integrity would double down on it. Whats your choice, Jphelan?


PJ - how about this from Page 88 of the 2013 Clinton Foundation tax return Link that YOU provided:





Here is a quick breakdown or 2012 and 2013 revenue / salaries and expenses. I was wrong. it looks like far less than 15% is going to charitable causes unless this is somehow buried in "other expenses"


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
So, I heard some others bitching about this Mark Levin guy so I decided to give a listen to one of his pod cast' to see just who he was.....

WOW, what a loud obnoxious ass. Well, that's my opinion anyway. The really funny thing is, as I was listening I thought, "this must be what marcisdave sounds like".
Hey, this could be a fun exercise, as long as the two-year olds here don't ruin it.

I see BobOrme as Senator Joseph McCarthy (I don't think Bob would be insulted), Boilerman as Bill O'Reilly (ditto), Roulette Man as General Jack D. Ripper from Dr. Strangelove, and DonDiego as Dr. Strangelove himself.

And of course CowboyKell is Joe Isuzu.


And Forkie as the old west medicine man.

Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
Here is a quick breakdown or 2012 and 2013 revenue / salaries and expenses. I was wrong. it looks like far less than 15% is going to charitable causes unless this is somehow buried in "other expenses"...
Nope, those amounts are going to "grants." But like I said yesterday:

So the Federalist Society/Freepers are claiming that the ONLY CGI money that actually helps people is in the form of grants to other organizations, as if the CGI is incapable of administering programs themselves. I can't believe they can find people dim enough to believe that claim. Obviously, they've found people dishonest enough to spread it.

Kind of nailed it, didn't I?

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now