The Clinton Foundation is closing

I can't believe Jatki posts an editorial from Investor Business Daily, a weekly publication that calls itself a Daily and whose owner started it because he thought the Wall St Journal was too liberal.
He might want to Google IBD vs Stephen Hawking and save himself future embarrassment.
How Stephen Hawking Proves That Investor's Business Daily's Editorial Page Tells Lies
Stephen Hawking was born in Oxford. He currently teaches at the University of Cambridge. Oxford and Cambridge have something in common: They're both in England. Which makes this editorial in Investor's Business Daily unfortunate indeed.
People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless.
Sigh. You could write some long response to the rest of the lies and distortions in that IBD editorial, but the more appropriate reply is to just warn people against ever reading the editorial page in Investor's Business Daily. It's not just that they didn't know that Stephen Hawking was born in England. It's that the underlying point was wrong, as you'll note from the continued existence of Stephen Hawking. They didn't choose an unfortunate example for an accurate point. They simply lied.
By Ezra Klein  |  August 10, 2009; 3:55 PM ET
The remarkable thing is that it's been up there for almost two weeks.
People here are confusing The Clinton Foundation with The Clinton Global Initiative. The Initiative is one aspect of the Foundation and is closing. Not the foundation itself. But why let facts get in your way?
Billy, their money came from selling favors. Favors paid for by the American taxpayer. That the point.

You can go back to sleep now.


Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Seriously? Did you bother to read the article? It shows how they made there money, and none of it came from their foundation.
You just disproved your very own arguement.



Let's see how much money the Clintons garner in speech money now that they have zero ability to sell tax subsidized favors.

What do you think, PJ?


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
We have all heard her speak - she is terrible, so why would anyone pay 200,000 to hear her? Have the clintons given any speeches in the last 3 months?

Why is the charity going out of business?

Is the answer - because the clintons no longer have access?


When Hoops has nothing he presents evidence in the form of a question.

I dont have to ask nebulous questions about Trump's profiting from special interest groups. its happening by the millions as I write this post. I left lots of space below for Hoops to pretend like he gives a shit.


Indy- give PJ a minute as he consults his crystal ball...
Quote

Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
Let's see how much money the Clintons garner in speech money now that they have zero ability to sell tax subsidized favors.

What do you think, PJ?



Future tense? Really?

I dont need to speculate about the future to see the live-streamed scum-money flowing into Donald Trump's pocket starting on his first day in office.....and I dont need to speculate that it doesn't bother you at all. These are present tense, empirical facts


You mean like the support given to a proven liar like Liarry? Because she was Your Brand Of Liar?
Dang it...I was finally going to send in a sawbuck or two. Guess I'll have to save it for my next Vegas trip.

PJ knows the answer to the questions is that people are no longer interested in what the Clinton's have to say,now that they no longer have influence.

Trump no longer controls his company which provides actual services as compared to the Clintons who offered nothing.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
We have all heard her speak - she is terrible, so why would anyone pay 200,000 to hear her? Have the clintons given any speeches in the last 3 months?

Why is the charity going out of business?

Is the answer - because the clintons no longer have access?


When Hoops has nothing he presents evidence in the form of a question.

I dont have to ask nebulous questions about Trump's profiting from special interest groups. its happening by the millions as I write this post. I left lots of space below for Hoops to pretend like he gives a shit.


Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now