Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
To Dan regarding your challenge: Suppose your opponent in this challenge finds a full pay machine? Is your challenge still on? And are you making this challenge because you, yourself, don't believe anyone can make a profit playing video poker?
Here's what you wrote, Dan, and it makes no mention that a poor pay table is required... you just gave the option for playing a poor paytable:
"Come to Vegas, find a vp game that you like to play (remember, the crappier the pay schedule, the easier it is to win, right?), play 30 hours at a minumum of 500 hands per hour and we'll match your results with real money. If you're a winner after that time, I'll double your winning. However, if you lose, you now owe me an equal amount of your loss. Pick any game/denomination/location you'd like. I'll be here waiting.....it will be the most lucrative play in town for me."
In order for you to make this bet/offer it seems to me that you, yourself, believe that video poker cannot be beaten? I would think that even Arcimedes would want to take this bet? Certainly Dancer would!
Money, please don't twist what I said....
This offer was specific to Singer (original), Singer #2 (a.k.a. tomdoug) and Singer #3 (a.k.a. thlf). Why? Because I contend that if you let any/all of these three play utilizing the "Singer method" with "special plays" that in even the relatively short span of 30 hours and 500 hph that they'll lose. In their case, it doesn't matter what game they find....if Singer's method is employed, it'll take the positive advantage out of the machine. So yes, this offer is for the three of them; anywhere in Vegas at any time.
Contrary to what you state, I KNOW that vp can be beaten. That's why you don't see me offering it to Arci or even melbedewy (despite his incoherent albeit very amusing videos) as these guys know you can beat the game. Beating the game consists of playing good vp games incorporating mathematically correct strategy, getting cash back, getting bounce back, taking advantage of offers and promotions (including drawings, tournaments, etc.). When you add all of this together, it's a winning formula....not necessarily today or this week or even this month but certainly year in and year out.
To be clear, I'm not president of the Dancer fan club....in fact I'm not even a member. It's pretty evident that Bob works both sides of the fence and looks out for his own best interest. Without putting words in his mouth, I'm pretty sure Arci shares similar feelings about Dancer. Nonetheless, I have to give the guy credit where it's due. He does play, he does win (overall), he is knowledgable and he does know how to analyze and evaluate a play and to attempt to maximize its return.
Just ask yourself a question.....if you could play vp for 25 hours a year, earn thousands of dollars and get tons of free play, why would you "retire" from this? This nails the BS meter. Honestly, I don't care how Singer plays...it's his money....have fun and do what you want. But to have him or his desciples come on here and essentially discredit anyone else who doesn't employ his method warrants being called out about it.