Democrat Convention Begins Today

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Roulette Man

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: alanleroyII

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
So does Forkie do a background check on all photos he posts? Of course not, but he expects it of others.

Remember when Swami (Forkie) predicted the Democratic Convention will be a bit more boring? Well like most of his predictions, he is way off. I expect there to be further fireworks before the closing of this thing.

---

Hell I remember when his thorough on-line forensic analysis proved Weiner's wiener wasn't Weiner's.

---

And I admitted that I was wrong.

That's what you do if you have a little class. Don't you wish you did?

---

Forkie implying he has class?...

---

Not that much really. But a lot compared with you, because I admit when I get facts wrong. Is that how you behave offline too? I'd hate to contemplate that.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
So does Forkie do a background check on all photos he posts?...

---

No, but thanks for asking. However this is what I do.

1. I check the source. If the name of the site is hillaryistotallybitchin.com, or lockuphillarytoday.com, there's a good chance it's either run by crazies or is just a clickbait site. So I get a second opinion.

2. I Google it. Carl Sagan said “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” So the if the claim is extraordinary, again I get a second opinion. If the claim is phony, it usually shows up in the first few google hits on a factcheck site or Snopes.

3. When I am wrong, I admit it. I've been known to just say "whoops" or "I regret the error," which are both a little snide and not the classiest way to do it. But at least I admit it.

Roulette Man, I'm pretty sure if you had done step 1 or step 2, you would have realized that your photo was a fake. Now it's time to move on to step 3.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Roulette Man

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Roulette Man
So does Forkie do a background check on all photos he posts?...

---

No, but thanks for asking. However this is what I do.

1. I check the source. If the name of the site is hillaryistotallybitchin.com, or lockuphillarytoday.com, there's a good chance it's either run by crazies or is just a clickbait site. So I get a second opinion.

2. I Google it. Carl Sagan said “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” So the if the claim is extraordinary, again I get a second opinion. If the claim is phony, it usually shows up in the first few google hits on a factcheck site or Snopes.

3. When I am wrong, I admit it. I've been known to just say "whoops" or "I regret the error," which are both a little snide and not the classiest way to do it. But at least I admit it.

Roulette Man, I'm pretty sure if you had done step 1 or step 2, you would have realized that your photo was a fake. Now it's time to move on to step 3.

---

This is pretty much bullshit too. You save it to PhotoBucket so no one can see the source of your picture(s)...

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: billryan
How does 32 in almost eight months convert to 120 in a year?
One is too many, but making up shit does nothing to forward your argument.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: jatki99

Quote

---

Originally posted by: billryan
How does 32 in almost eight months convert to 120 in a year?
One is too many, but making up shit does nothing to forward your argument.

---

I don't think it matters one iota just how many are killed it's the fact that they're being "targeted" by a group that has the backing of the govt. That's what is plain F'ed up.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: forkushV

Quote

---

Originally posted by: jatki99

Quote

---

Originally posted by: billryan
How does 32 in almost eight months convert to 120 in a year?
One is too many, but making up shit does nothing to forward your argument.

---

I don't think it matters one iota just how many are killed it's the fact that they're being "targeted" by a group that has the backing of the govt. That's what is plain F'ed up.

---

BLM is targeting and then murdering police officers?

I bet you're too embarrassed to site a source for that claim. And if it just came out of your head, you should be even more embarrassed. And if you didn't mean to use the word "targeted" - in quotes - the way everyone understands it, then you should just go away.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Poor old DonDiego loves romantic moments, . . . . . . .

---