Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
On the other hand, if the benefits are available Cowboy Kell might consider accepting them and then giving them to charities that do good works. It would be more beneficial than letting the Government hold onto them, . . . or, since there is no "SS lock box" and monies are fungible, waste them on inefficient-or-ineffective-or-inappropriate Government programs.
Originally posted by: DonDiego
QuoteIf CowboyKell is rejecting Social Security benefits on principle, DonDiego salutes him.
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
I have paid the maximum into social security each year since 1987. I do not and will not receive any SS benefits.
On the other hand, if the benefits are available Cowboy Kell might consider accepting them and then giving them to charities that do good works. It would be more beneficial than letting the Government hold onto them, . . . or, since there is no "SS lock box" and monies are fungible, waste them on inefficient-or-ineffective-or-inappropriate Government programs.
Now for the rest of the story.......I am not yet of the eligible age for SS benefits.
When I do reach that age I will most likely apply to receive what I am eligible for dependent on the advice of my accountants. Reallocating the benefit funds would be much more efficient than leaving them with our U.S.Govt.