Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

Democrats Fear Cyber 'October Surprise' That Could Sink Clinton

forkushV
forkushV
Jul 27, 2016
12:05pm
Block User
Quid. Pro. Quo.

jatki
jatki
Jul 27, 2016
12:12pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99

" Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails, political operatives and cybersecurity experts tell NBC News they are bracing for an "October Surprise" -- a release of even more potentially damaging information timed to influence the outcome of the presidential election and the course of the next administration.

The big question isn't whether more information will be disclosed, they say, but how destructive it might be to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and to broader U.S. foreign policy efforts...
So you're saying that Putin wants to elect Trump. Why do you think he wants to do that?


Where did I say that? All I said is I would to see the hill for what she truly is.
From what you posted, now in bold. So Russian intelligence wants to damage Hillary/help Trump. Why do you think Putin wants to do that?


I didn't write what you emboldened, I just posted some quotes from an article and of course posted the link. If you want to criticize the author, I suggest you write said source.
jatki
jatki
Jul 27, 2016
12:19pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: vegasdev
I don't think crooked Clinton or the dems fear much of anything. they are very aware of just how much the American voters have been dumbed down.


True, look how they're gonna let this current thing pass, they'd probabaly let anything else fly too. I would have to say, and I hope it doesn't happen, is if someone leaks truly classified emails, like with names of guys deep down who've spent years establishing their cover. That really wouldn't be cool. I'd love to see her get buried but not at that expense.

I wonder ..IF something like that came out, would/could Hillary THEN be recommended for prosecution by the FBI? or could they say it wasn't her fault or some bullshit like that?


Sorry Vegas dev, not directed particularly at you, I just started writing....
forkushV
forkushV
Jul 27, 2016
12:22pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99

" Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails, political operatives and cybersecurity experts tell NBC News they are bracing for an "October Surprise" -- a release of even more potentially damaging information timed to influence the outcome of the presidential election and the course of the next administration.

The big question isn't whether more information will be disclosed, they say, but how destructive it might be to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and to broader U.S. foreign policy efforts...
So you're saying that Putin wants to elect Trump. Why do you think he wants to do that?


Where did I say that? All I said is I would to see the hill for what she truly is.
From what you posted, now in bold. So Russian intelligence wants to damage Hillary/help Trump. Why do you think Putin wants to do that?


I didn't write what you emboldened, I just posted some quotes from an article and of course posted the link. If you want to criticize the author, I suggest you write said source.
So either you posted something you really didn't believe, or when you posted it you didn't notice that it said Putin was pulling the strings.

Neither reflects well on you.

jatki
jatki
Jul 27, 2016
12:25pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
I'll lose about as much sleep over an "October surprise" as I did over the other predictions surrounding email-gate. And the people who propagate those fairy tales will lose about the same amount of integrity.


Bet boiler again if you're that confident. I'm sure he'll take it. Shoot, wish I lived closer, I'd like to be in on that, not so much for the bet but to sit down with you guys.
BobOrme
BobOrme
Jul 27, 2016
9:41pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99

" Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails, political operatives and cybersecurity experts tell NBC News they are bracing for an "October Surprise" -- a release of even more potentially damaging information timed to influence the outcome of the presidential election and the course of the next administration.

The big question isn't whether more information will be disclosed, they say, but how destructive it might be to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and to broader U.S. foreign policy efforts...
So you're saying that Putin wants to elect Trump. Why do you think he wants to do that?


Where did I say that? All I said is I would to see the hill for what she truly is.
From what you posted, now in bold. So Russian intelligence wants to damage Hillary/help Trump. Why do you think Putin wants to do that?


I didn't write what you emboldened, I just posted some quotes from an article and of course posted the link. If you want to criticize the author, I suggest you write said source.
So either you posted something you really didn't believe, or when you posted it you didn't notice that it said Putin was pulling the strings.

Neither reflects well on you.

YOU are the only person who posted in this thread that Putin was involved. I guess you see a word you wrote and jump on others about the word.

What's really sick is, there was nothing important or security related in the 30,000 deleted emails, according to Killary and every left-wing hack defending her "extremely careless" use of her personal email server. If that was/is true, why would anyone worry about exposing the content of those emails? The entire content of the deleted email is a nothingburger, right?

It's Julian Assange through WikiLeaks that is exposing things that Killery said weren't related to her job or our national security, and he promises more to come.

IF the hackers were Russian, I think Killery thought enough money had been funneled into her family's foundation from Russia for her to believe nobody in Russia would expose her dirty filthy stinking laundry. How much money did she take from Russian entities? How much money has Trump taken from Russian entities?


forkushV
forkushV
Jul 28, 2016
3:15am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99

" Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails, political operatives and cybersecurity experts tell NBC News they are bracing for an "October Surprise" -- a release of even more potentially damaging information timed to influence the outcome of the presidential election and the course of the next administration.

The big question isn't whether more information will be disclosed, they say, but how destructive it might be to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and to broader U.S. foreign policy efforts...
So you're saying that Putin wants to elect Trump. Why do you think he wants to do that?


Where did I say that? All I said is I would to see the hill for what she truly is.
From what you posted, now in bold. So Russian intelligence wants to damage Hillary/help Trump. Why do you think Putin wants to do that?


I didn't write what you emboldened, I just posted some quotes from an article and of course posted the link. If you want to criticize the author, I suggest you write said source.
So either you posted something you really didn't believe, or when you posted it you didn't notice that it said Putin was pulling the strings.

Neither reflects well on you.

YOU are the only person who posted in this thread that Putin was involved....
Wanna bet?

Here's what jatki posted: "Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails..."
BobOrme
BobOrme
Jul 28, 2016
11:39am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99

" Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails, political operatives and cybersecurity experts tell NBC News they are bracing for an "October Surprise" -- a release of even more potentially damaging information timed to influence the outcome of the presidential election and the course of the next administration.

The big question isn't whether more information will be disclosed, they say, but how destructive it might be to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and to broader U.S. foreign policy efforts...
So you're saying that Putin wants to elect Trump. Why do you think he wants to do that?


Where did I say that? All I said is I would to see the hill for what she truly is.
From what you posted, now in bold. So Russian intelligence wants to damage Hillary/help Trump. Why do you think Putin wants to do that?


I didn't write what you emboldened, I just posted some quotes from an article and of course posted the link. If you want to criticize the author, I suggest you write said source.
So either you posted something you really didn't believe, or when you posted it you didn't notice that it said Putin was pulling the strings.

Neither reflects well on you.

YOU are the only person who posted in this thread that Putin was involved....
Wanna bet?

Here's what jatki posted: "Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails..."


Where is "Putin" in that quote? It isn't. Doubling down on a lie doesn't turn it into the truth.
forkushV
forkushV
Jul 28, 2016
12:48pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99

" Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails, political operatives and cybersecurity experts tell NBC News they are bracing for an "October Surprise" -- a release of even more potentially damaging information timed to influence the outcome of the presidential election and the course of the next administration.

The big question isn't whether more information will be disclosed, they say, but how destructive it might be to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and to broader U.S. foreign policy efforts...
So you're saying that Putin wants to elect Trump. Why do you think he wants to do that?


Where did I say that? All I said is I would to see the hill for what she truly is.
From what you posted, now in bold. So Russian intelligence wants to damage Hillary/help Trump. Why do you think Putin wants to do that?


I didn't write what you emboldened, I just posted some quotes from an article and of course posted the link. If you want to criticize the author, I suggest you write said source.
So either you posted something you really didn't believe, or when you posted it you didn't notice that it said Putin was pulling the strings.

Neither reflects well on you.

YOU are the only person who posted in this thread that Putin was involved....
Wanna bet?

Here's what jatki posted: "Now that U.S. authorities are confident Russian intelligence agencies are behind the hack of Democratic Party emails..."


Where is "Putin" in that quote? It isn't. Doubling down on a lie doesn't turn it into the truth.
You're kidding, right?

jatki
jatki
Jul 28, 2016
1:36pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quid. Pro. Quo.



Truly hilarious. You'll post stuff like this and completely disregard/denounce when people post things linking the hill in a crooked deal. The completely crooked deal when Russia bought..er..took over 20% of the US uranium supply is the first thing that comes to mind.

You are truly a piece of work Forky and as transparent as crystal.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now