Don Diego's Dream Car




Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
As I have said many times before those auto jobs would never have gone away if GM/Chrysler had been allowed to go thru the normal bankruptcy process.

Due to demand for cars in the US those facilities would have been bought up by other companies and they would have made those cars to fill demand


What would have happened to them? There were no competing reorganization plans offered by any private investors. Since this was the only option on the table all of the jobs would have been lost if the government hadn't provided DIP financing. It is ludicrous to think competitors would have bought up old GM manufacturing faculties. Why would they do that when State governments all across the country are lining up to build them brand new plants to their specifications on the tax payers dime?

The loss of this many jobs (all of their suppliers would have went bankrupt too) would have dealt the economy a death blow.
Mal - who would have supplied the demand for cars if these 2 companies had dissolved? There would have been a multi- million shortfall in production.
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Mal - who would have supplied the demand for cars if these 2 companies had dissolved? There would have been a multi- million shortfall in production.



Demand would have fallen off the curve once we entered the great depression. Secondly many of their competitors went on record and said a GM/Chrysler liquidation would have jeopardized their financial health too as they use many of the same suppliers, and those suppliers would have went out business after not getting paid. Toyota said their best case would be that they were able to get their U.S. output up to existing levels (no expansion) after 2-3 years if GM went under.

Automobiles are a complex business. They simply can't be churned out over night. Auto factories also can't be built or repurposed overnight either. It takes years. If your fully financed and have everything in place it takes five years to launch a new model.

The U.S. government spent years rebuilding the Japanese auto business. More recently the Korean government has spent years and billions of dollars building the Korean auto business. Most recently despite large amounts of government money Australia can't find an auto company willing to build cars there. GM and Toyota have closed shop, and Toyota says no matter how much money the government was willing to spend it just wasn't feasible to build automobiles there because of a lack of suppliers. To think conservatives were willing to give our whole domestic industry away.


I thought DD would be more of a pimp mobile person.


Mal - you answered the question would somebody have stepped up to buy the plants and the brands. There would have been a shortage of manufacturing capacity even for the reduced demand of the time. However the govt jumped in gave Chrysler to fiat and took over GM. Somebody would have stepped in to buy GM for pennies on the dollar. No govt money would have been spent.
Lol that is a bizarre way of looking at it, and ignores the reality of modern auto manufacturing. Nobody would have bought the plants and nothing would have been usable because it was a take all situation in order to have one functioning vehicle. Plus taxpayers would have been on the hook for quite a bit as a consequence of those companies being shut down.

Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Mal - you answered the question would somebody have stepped up to buy the plants and the brands. There would have been a shortage of manufacturing capacity even for the reduced demand of the time. However the govt jumped in gave Chrysler to fiat and took over GM. Somebody would have stepped in to buy GM for pennies on the dollar. No govt money would have been spent.


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
GM gives $9000 bonus checks to workers

Turns out "government motors" didn't go bankrupt again like Boilerman promised it would. Instead it continues to provide lots of permanent jobs for US workers....high paying jobs....$9k bonus check jobs.
I'm glad our automobile sector was not outsourced to Japan in 2009 like both Boilerman and Hoops advocated. I'm willing to bet all those high paid workers agree - and so do the small businesses where those workers spend their paychecks.

And as for the highly controversial move into the electric car market....well, what car company isn't making electric cars now? Or plans to in the very near future? All those anti-advancement arguments against GM a few years ago seem rather silly now. Oh wait - Hoops and Boilerman are still making them now. Readers should consider their history on this topic. I give them credit for still trying to make the hilarious arguments that even Mitt Romney was forced to abandon when he saw the facts. Good times, good times.

It's easier for a company to give bonuses to their employees when the company doesn't pay federal income taxes. I would think that your frequent outcries about corporate welfare would negate any positive feelings about the GM employee bonuses....but since the government bailout (which really only guaranteed union pensions and screwed bond holders) cost taxpayers many billions of lost dollars was an ObeyMe action, it is all okay.

Potential trouble down the road - $24b in unfunded pension fund liabilities

"The company also reported that the underfunded gap for its U.S. pension plans grew to $10.9 billion from $7.3 billion at the end of 2013. The gap for its pension plans outside the U.S. increased to $13.1 billion from $12.4 billion in that same period."


If one deducts this unfunded pension debt from GM's already government subsidized profits, the company lost $1.3 billion. Hiding debt in this fashion doesn't make the debt disappear, although this game of "hide and go seek" does make Liberals feel better.


Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Potential trouble down the road - $24b in unfunded pension fund liabilities

"The company also reported that the underfunded gap for its U.S. pension plans grew to $10.9 billion from $7.3 billion at the end of 2013. The gap for its pension plans outside the U.S. increased to $13.1 billion from $12.4 billion in that same period."


Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now