AVOID AIRPORT FULL-BODY-SCANS !
In an LVA thread entitled “NO profiling!” over a year ago, in a discussion about airport full-body-scanners suecasey reported:
In an LVA thread entitled “NO profiling!” over a year ago, in a discussion about airport full-body-scanners suecasey reported:
Quote
Originally posted by: suecasey
The latest I read is that they're now weighing the potential for safety from terrorists against the radiation dangers (possible cancer) to passengers from the body scanner machines.
DonDiego observed:
Originally posted by: suecasey
The latest I read is that they're now weighing the potential for safety from terrorists against the radiation dangers (possible cancer) to passengers from the body scanner machines.
DonDiego observed:
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
DonDiego will have to start taking the train, because he wishes no further X-ray exposure.
DonDiego’s apprehension may have been fortunate; he has never been subjected to a full-body-scan.
And now it turns out that perhaps the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has misinformed US citizens and especially Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees, . . . about the safety of the subject devices.
As a result of a lawsuit brought against the DHS for failure to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) the following facts have been revealed :
• TSA employees have identified cancer clusters [among themselves] allegedly linked to radiation exposure while operating body scanners and other screening technology. However, the agency failed to issue employees dosimeters - safety devices that would warn of radiation exposure.
• The DHS has publicly mischaracterized the findings of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, stating that NIST "affirmed the safety" of full body scanners. NIST stated that the Institute did not, in fact, test full body scanners for safety, and that the Institute does not do product testing.
• A Johns Hopkins University study revealed that radiation zones around body scanners could exceed the “General Public Dose Limit.”
• A NIST study warns airport screeners to avoid standing next to full body scanners.
DonDiego suggests:
__One should always choose the indignity of a full-pat-down in preference to exposure to possible cancer-causing radiation whenever one flies.
__One should always remain skeptical when the Government is assuring one that he is safe.
And now it turns out that perhaps the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has misinformed US citizens and especially Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees, . . . about the safety of the subject devices.
As a result of a lawsuit brought against the DHS for failure to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) the following facts have been revealed :
• TSA employees have identified cancer clusters [among themselves] allegedly linked to radiation exposure while operating body scanners and other screening technology. However, the agency failed to issue employees dosimeters - safety devices that would warn of radiation exposure.
• The DHS has publicly mischaracterized the findings of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, stating that NIST "affirmed the safety" of full body scanners. NIST stated that the Institute did not, in fact, test full body scanners for safety, and that the Institute does not do product testing.
• A Johns Hopkins University study revealed that radiation zones around body scanners could exceed the “General Public Dose Limit.”
• A NIST study warns airport screeners to avoid standing next to full body scanners.
DonDiego suggests:
__One should always choose the indignity of a full-pat-down in preference to exposure to possible cancer-causing radiation whenever one flies.
__One should always remain skeptical when the Government is assuring one that he is safe.