Erin Andrews peephole video

Don't get too carried away (lol). I feel like smoking a cigarette and I don't even smoke (ha-ha).


Edited: Having 2nd thoughts about posting this, sorry but do your own search.

DonDiego opines surf87's second thoughts are the correct ones.

Yes. I only clicked to say. How sad of you. Glad you came to a better moral choice. Participating in a crime even after the fact is still a crime. I don't think Marriott should have been found liable but see the point of the whole mess. I feel he should have been charged with a sex crime. We don't need to make new laws just enforce the ones we already have. She is being sexually exploited daily and that is rape. I have no clue what happened to him criminally and only saw the verdict of the civil suit.

Sorry to disagree with you Dasiy, but seeing someone naked is light years from somebody forcibly penetrating a women, light years. Rape is one of the most despicable, abhorrent crimes that could ever be perpetrated on a woman. A naked body isn't that big a deal when compared to some of the savage things that go on in this world, so many sickos, peeping on someone probably wouldn't even crack the top ten of abhorent crimes, and I hardly think it's worth 75 million dollars either. Now trying to sell the video is another story and should be pumished much harsher than the act of simply watching someone naked. The guys a perv and should be treated as such.

For the record:
"An Illinois insurance executive who secretly shot nude videos of ESPN reporter Erin Andrews was sentenced Monday to 2½ years in prison after giving a tearful apology that was harshly rebuked by his victim.
Michael David Barrett pleaded guilty in December to interstate stalking after prosecutors accused him of following the reporter to at least three cities and shooting the videos through hotel peepholes.
Barrett, 48, of suburban Chicago, agreed to a 27-month prison sentence after pleading guilty but it was up to the judge to decide how long he would actually serve.
Andrews urged the judge at the hearing for a harsher sentence and said she fears for her life every time she enters a hotel.
'You violated me and you violated all women, Andrews told Barrett. 'You are a sexual predator, a sexual deviant and they should lock you up.'
After the sentencing, she said, 'Thirty months isn't enough.' "
Ref: ESPN

Calling this offense "rape" diminishes the serious character and consequences of a real rape. It isn't "rape", but DonDiego would not object to a longer sentence.

Also, for the record, poor old DonDiego has not searched for nor viewed the peeper-video of Ms. Andrews. DonDiego may be a lowlife, but not that low.

I agree Jatki. Arguing that rape is no worse than being pictured naked is setting a terrible precedent, as it minimized the evilness of rape.

Being viewed naked is light years away from being raped - ask any woman who has been raped. Stalking should not be tolerated and this cretin Barrett deserves prison time. Does anyone really think that Andrews would have been awarded $75 million dollars if she were an average unknown woman - I think not.

I wonder how many forum members here will admit to watching the video?

I kinda looked for it, got a dead link and didn't pursue it any further, didn't care tha much. I was only wondering how expicit it was that it was worth 75 mil. Seen one naked body, seen 'em all.

I did not look at the video, as I felt it's an invasion of the woman's privacy. I understand that this may appear quaint, but that's the truth.