The Fat Man is in trouble (Chris Christie)

Russell George, the Treasury Department official who detailed the IRS targeting of conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status, says liberal groups faced far less scrutiny from the agency.

George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, told Democratic Rep. Sandy Levin of Michigan in a letter that just six progressive groups were targeted compared to 292 conservative groups, reports the Washington Examiner.

In Wednesday's letter to Levin, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, George also said that 100 percent of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status were scrutinized, compared to 30 percent of progressive groups.

Levin and other Democrats claimed this week that progressive groups were targeted just as much as conservatives, and pointed to new information showing that the terms "progress" and "progressive" were also on the so-called "Be on the Lookout," or BOLO lists.

"Based on the information you flagged . . . TIGTA performed additional research which determined that six tax-exempt applications filed between May 2010 and May 2012 having the words 'progress' or 'progressive' in their names were included in the 298 cases the IRS identified as potential political cases," wrote George.

"We also determined that 14 tax-exempt applications filed between May 2010 and May 2012 using the words 'progress' or 'progressive' in their names were not referred for added scrutiny as potential political cases."

Democrats have charged that George's initial audit allowed Republicans to over-politicize the IRS handling of applications for special tax status.

"In total, 30 percent of the organizations we identified with the words 'progress' or 'progressive' in their names were processed as potential political cases," George wrote, adding, "In comparison, our audit found that 100 percent of the tax-exempt applications with Tea Party, Patriots, or 9/12 in their names were processed as potential political cases during the timeframe of our audit."
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Russell George, the Treasury Department official who detailed the IRS targeting of conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status, says liberal groups faced far less scrutiny from the agency.


Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Russell George, the Treasury Department official who detailed the IRS targeting of conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status, says liberal groups faced far less scrutiny from the agency.
There isn't anything inherently unlawful about this. Presumptively, the scrutiny of the conservative groups was within the bounds of the statutory powers of the IRS. Presumptively, the relevant statutes were not violative of the 1st Amendment.

The mere unequal allocation of resources (unequal scrutiny) by the IRS is not unlawful. The burden would lie with the plaintiffs to PROVE specific violations of statutes/regulations, or Constitutional standards, by specific individuals. That would be incredibly difficult to do; generally there are no standards requiring the IRS to treat anyone with kid gloves. The IRS can generally pull any app or tax return to examine, as they see fit.

Do you think they need to explain why they keep auditing Oprah Winfrey and Willie Nelson?

Don't think Bruce Springsteen will be Gov Christie's favorite rock & roller any more !

This is a MUST SEE VIDEO ! LMFAO FUNNY !!

Linky: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKHV0LLvhXM


Quote

Originally posted by: marcisdave
Don't think Bruce Springsteen will be Gov Christie's favorite rock & roller any more !

This is a MUST SEE VIDEO ! LMFAO FUNNY !!

Linky: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKHV0LLvhXM





I do not like the double standard, how you liberals can not admitt this, is amazing to me, but overall I should be glad because Marco Rubio is my man for the GOP 2016. I just hope if he has to pause for a drink of water, does not mean he can not run a country!
While the media focuses on a traffic jam on a bridge that has daily traffic jams, they ignore reports that obama & clinton were making military decisions on based on what will get them the most votes, a report blaming the state dept for Benghazi (not a video) and that the already high premiums for obamacare may not be high enough
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
...they ignore reports that obama & clinton were making military decisions on based on what will get them the most votes, a report blaming the state dept for Benghazi (not a video)...
Is that what they are saying on the right-wing radio? Remember when it was all Hillary's fault that the initial intelligence reports proved faulty?

They should be ashamed of spreading that lie, and you should be embarrassed for having believed them.



Meanwhile, this is rock solid evidence that Christie employed criminals:

Your statement implies that Gov Christie knowlingly hired crooks, which is not the case
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now