The Fat Man is in trouble (Chris Christie)

Forkie, we understand that you don't care that Hillary is a crook and that she has obstructed justice. Don't be so silly as to act as though she hasn't destroyed evidence.


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Why are new emails just now being released? Why are more new emails scheduled to be released over the next few months? Why in the hell does it take more than one investigation for Democrats to release all of the information pertaining to any investigation? Obstruction of justice? Lying under oath?
Here is a summary of Bob's last post:

? ? ? ? ?

That's right, no evidence, no statement of facts, not even any allegations of wrongdoing. Just questions.

Bob, write when you got something.


Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Forkie, we understand that you don't care that Hillary is a crook and that she has obstructed justice. Don't be so silly as to act as though she hasn't destroyed evidence...
Source? Evidence? ANYTHING???

Boilerman, Roulette Man, please. Write when you got something.
I think Forkie was one of those who believed OJ was innocent.

The evidence will eventually be squeezed out from the obstructionist administration. She destroyed tens of thousands of emails, and I suspect that she's had the server physically destroyed. In other words, she destroyed anything that was damaging.

She destroyed 30,000 emails, and sent over 30,000 emails..............some edited. "'The server contains personal communications from my husband and me," Clinton said. Bill, of course has said that he doesn't used email, so why is Hillary claiming otherwise.

She's a crook, and most Liberals don't care. Certainly Forkie, Chilly and PJ don't give a hoot. I'll admit that finding a smoking gun is difficult once it's been thrown in the middle of the Atlantic ocean, but the pieces to the puzzle will be put together over time.

Forkie is very comfortable with his folks lying and cheating and breaking the law.



Read more: https://dailycaller.com/2015/03/28/did-hillary-scrub-her-private-server-sometime-this-month-video/#ixzz3el39ttJN"


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Forkie, we understand that you don't care that Hillary is a crook and that she has obstructed justice. Don't be so silly as to act as though she hasn't destroyed evidence...
Source? Evidence? ANYTHING???

Boilerman, Roulette Man, please. Write when you got something.


Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
...Forkie is very comfortable with his folks lying and cheating and breaking the law.

Read more: https://dailycaller.com/2015/03/28/did-hillary-scrub-her-private-server-sometime-this-month-video/#ixzz3el39ttJN"
You're kidding, The Daily Caller is your source? Let's all point and laugh.

Boilerman (and Roulette Man), write when you got something.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Why are new emails just now being released? Why are more new emails scheduled to be released over the next few months? Why in the hell does it take more than one investigation for Democrats to release all of the information pertaining to any investigation? Obstruction of justice? Lying under oath?
Here is a summary of Bob's last post:

? ? ? ? ?

That's right, no evidence, no statement of facts, not even any allegations of wrongdoing. Just questions.

Bob, write when you got something.



A judge has to order the release of her emails.
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Why are new emails just now being released? Why are more new emails scheduled to be released over the next few months? Why in the hell does it take more than one investigation for Democrats to release all of the information pertaining to any investigation? Obstruction of justice? Lying under oath?
Here is a summary of Bob's last post:

? ? ? ? ?

That's right, no evidence, no statement of facts, not even any allegations of wrongdoing. Just questions.

Bob, write when you got something.



A judge has to order the release of her emails.
That's not what your link says, Bob. You know, when Boilerman and hoops just make shit up, they have the smarts not to post a link. Maybe you should consider it.

Reality (according to YOUR link): The State Department proposed releasing emails every two months, Vice News wanted the released every two weeks. The judge more or less split the difference.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now