FBI expands probe of Hillary's email?

"As usual Republicans are running around with their heads up their collective asses." Yet Hillary is the one that's going to jail.

Boilerman is a great judge of toasty-ness. Just ask President Romney.

It's not about their detailed knowledge of best practices for network security. It's about their ability to ask the right questions and put the right team in place. That gets back to the judgment and competence thing. If her team is such a huge fail when it comes to basic security on her communications as Secretary of State, what confidence can we have in her as President? Like maybe she'll wipe the White House Servers.....with a cloth.

Even more (as you admit), her support of the Iraq War boondoggle further demonstrates how she'll back whatever course seems politically expedient at the time. Of course The Bern and The Donald both opposed the Iraq War.


She's a Liar!

Gee, a bad personnel decision - President's never do that. Except Lincoln promoted General McClellan. And Obama hired Petraeus, Rahm Emmanuel, and Tim Geithner. And the fifteen or so appointees of Reagan who were either convicted, plead guilty, or received pardons. Or name any other administration, and the list goes on.

And speaking of IT, the 2012 Romney get out the vote effort was a total technological disaster. They distributed bad passwords and at one point their ISP shut down their internet access - on election day! - because they thought their the heavy traffic was a denial of service attack. If Romney ran again, would you use his failure to hire the right IT people disqualify him from consideration?

If your answer is "yes" to that, I think you're an idiot. And if you're answer is "no," I know you're a hypocrite.

I'm pretty sure Hillary has already plead guilty to "bad judgement" regarding her email practices. And The GOP winner in IOWA wanted to shut down the federal government over an illegally compiled Planned Parenthood video. Voters are free to weigh "bad judgement" in each case according to their own values.

But The argument on this board for the past year has been that Hillary is a crook because of her emails. If Hillary is a crook then so are two cabinet members from the previous administration... or none of them are guilty. That's an obvious fact to anyone who isn't a hypocrite and not one right-leaning person on this board has been able acknowledge it.

Let's go, righties! Start combing through your Alex Jones chronicles and find the next conspiracy you want to raise your blood pressure over. This one is toast. And so is your integrity.

I will keep it simple PJ --- there is a HUGE difference between choosing to conduct ALL State Department Business for you and your senior staff on a private server under your control

AND

receiving a handful of emails related to business on your private email account.


Did Condi and Colin receive any emails from the President on their Private email account? NO --- but Hillary received messages from President Obama BECAUSE THE PRIVATE EMAIL ADDRESS WAS THE ONLY ONE SHE USED!

Huge difference --- if you cannot see it, you are blind.

The watermark you, Boilerman, FOX News and every right wing hack in the country has been pointing to for the last year is "Top Secret emails on a personal Email account". That watermark has been revealed to have been broken by the previous administration. And you are struggling with that awful fact, aren't you? Poor thing.

Moving the goalposts now isn't going to salvage the ridiculous case you've made. And I know you think its ridiculous too or you wouldn't be so hypocritcal

So, PJ - would your company let you use your personal server and email account to conduct sensitive company business when they provide you an email address as part of your job?

Would you keep your job if received blow jobs in your office from a woman who reports through your chain of command?

I think the answer both would be NO, but you are not a Clinton ---- and that is my point.

Well that's your point now. But an hour ago it was that she used a personal server to communicate with the president. And prior to that, before the unsurprising revelations that Colin and Condi had some of their emails retroactively classified, it was that some [retroactively] classified emails had passed through her server. And before that, it was Benghazi, wasn't it?

Oh, and "blowjobs" is one word.

Of course people make mistakes all the time. Especially those who make a lot of decisions. Each person has to make his own choice as to whether things like allowing a poorly secured homebrew personal server to house top secret information or supporting the Iraq War 'disqualify a candidate from consideration' as Commander In Chief.

Both are strikes against and indicate poor choices. But in the grand scheme of things we compare the choices and accomplishments of one candidate against another. What were Hillary's accomplishments again? Like how did that Reset with Russia work out for us? Or the Arab Spring and the Democracy she brought to the Middle East. And what did she accomplish as US Senator? Those are more important questions for me. Unless there really was some criminal act that gets uncovered in the FBI probe. Then all bets are off.

Oh...and I'm sure you must agree with me on everything remotely similar to the things I say...or you're an idiot....or a hypocrite. I'm going with both.