Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Some insights into the legal possibilities of the disposition of the findings regarding one Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton [prophetically named "Hillary" after Sir Edmund Hillary who summated Mount Everest on 29 May 1953, 5½ years after her birth] with regard to perjury, mishandling of secure communications, et. al. :
Two Smoking Guns: FBI on Hillary's Case by Andrew P. Napolitano, 15 January 2016
More Hillary Chronicles Andrew P. Napolitano, 17 December 2015
DonDiego recommends any thoughtful criticisms of these articles refer to the content, as opposed to the source website, antiwar.com or the personal character/preferences/appearance of the author, Anthony P. Napolitano; mention of his political persuasion/employment history/bibliography are fair game.
DonDiego recommends it, . . . but he does not expect it.
This is not anything the left and Hillary apologists want to hear, so I'm certain it will be attacked and shot down by the group.
I have to say, this part shocked me to no end.
"This investigation was probably provoked by several teams of independent researchers – some of whom are financial experts and have published their work – who have been investigating the Clinton Foundation for a few years. They have amassed a treasure-trove of documents demonstrating fraud and irregularities in fundraising and expenditures, and they have shown a pattern of favorable State Department treatment of foreign entities coinciding with donations by those entities to the Clinton Foundation and their engaging former President Bill Clinton to give speeches."
